Does Obamacare contain a clause that mandates invasive microchip implantation? The wording of subtitle c-11 section 2521 of the ACA speaks to an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.”
This section is so vaguely worded that it could definately permit for an implanted RFID chip. This particular section is actually a rewrite that used to speak directly to an implantable, radio frequency device, but after Ron Paul warned the public of this, it was changed.
MOVE TO SECOND PAGE:
There is more than one “implant” and obama seems to forger WE THE PEOPLE WILL PUT THIS RIGHT NO MATTER THE COST!
I guess I’ll have to die of some disease without treatment then. No WAY will I take the mark of the beast. I would imagine there’s already an underground network starting up to help the people who deny the beast.
I guess you could say it is more invasive than a tatto. Both identify, but this chip has the capability to be digitally manipulated with the wrong information. The chip is like a wallet that you can or can not add or remove information to identify your credits, $#%&!@*les, and time space history,(like a GPS on auto record), from.They have the option of giving citizens choice it be a ring or piece of jewlery.
Nope
Is this the Mark Of The Beast ???
Is it cancer causing-radio active?
Thats the day the trek to DC begins
Funny thing is, is that only a few states won’t allow its people to get the chip. And Wisconsin is one of them. So have fun with your chips hahaha
That’s not true
NOBAMA HAS TO GO