We know the leftist caricature of gun-rights advocates as stupid, poor, right-wing rednecks just isn’t true.
With socialists like Bernie Sanders insisting we shouldn’t be free to protect ourselves and supporting laws meant to prohibit citizens being armed in public, our right to defend ourselves and those we love is under attack.
When two white supremacists tried to take out their hatred by attacking a black man in a For Myers, Florida Waffle House restaurant they got what they deserved.
Bay Area Intifada shared some of the security camera footage that captured the action, as well as a local newscast with further information on the altercation.
Given the nature of the video, it’s appropriately age-restricted on YouTube and you can view it here on Truth And Action on the next page.
WATCH WHAT HAPPENED ON THE NEXT PAGE:
Waffle house makes I hop seem like a 5 star restaurant.
Gee the “greatest most powerful country in the history of the world and each citizen must have atleast two guns to protect themselves. from each other.Maybe we are not the greatest. Maybe we are just dysfunctional little boys with short sexual tools and need a big gun to make up for our short tools.
When this guy was yelling racial slurs at these folks, the employees may could have avoided the incident by calling police before things escalated. I agree that this is NOT the PURPOSE of the 2nd amendment but it is a reasonable APPLICATION of that right.
That is not why they want our guns. This is a power situation. Sadly FBI statistics show that most crime commits in minority neighborhoods. No I’m not going to post the statistics on this again. Look them up yourself.
So… if the government were concerned with crime they would focus in those areas rather than on taking rights but that is not the intent. A population that cannot fight back can be controlled. Therein is the problem. When those in power know they cannot be shot dead by the citizens then the power no longer rests with the people but rather with those in power.
David Wilson Maybe you will murder those around you but that does not mean others will do so.
if polcie didnt exist then i would say even a complete idiot would realize that a individual needed a gun to protect themselves and others from the random whack job or whatnot. will andrew u are special. and not the good kind.
Ken DeFrancesco Ken, I’m not sure why you think the need of a well regulated militia has long since passed. Are you absolutely sure our government can’t turn tyrannical in say, the next few years, the next few decades, the next few centuries? Further, a well regulated militia isn’t the military (army, navy, marines, air force, coast guard) nor is it the national guard. A well regulated militia is the citizens who turn soldiers during times of need. Their job isn’t just to fight WITH the government’s military (hopefully it always is) but also to fight the government’s military should the government turn tyrannical. Since there are no guarantees the government will never turn tyrannical, the well regulated militia will ALWAYS been needed.
I think you have an interesting view on guns. Guns are neither intented for or against defense. It’s the individuals intention on what they wish to use the gun for that determines if it is for defense or offense. I’m thinking you haven’t seen the stories about home owners who have, on countless occasions, defended their homes from invaders with their guns. Have you read this article? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/10/03/do-civilians-with-guns-ever-stop-mass-shootings/?tid=pm_opinions_pop_b. Each of these incidences was made possible by someone who carried a gun for defensive use. You might like to read this article, http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/10/us/home-invasion-gun-rights/ and this one, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/10/detroit-homeowner-shooting-intruder_n_5128271.html and this one http://www.pe.com/articles/lake-751423-elsinore-fatally.html. The list goes on and on. Yes, guns are used to attack innocent people by criminals. However, law abiding people use guns to defend themselves. Here’s an article with an interesting chart you might like to take a look at, http://www.youngcons.com/the-gun-control-chart-democrats-really-dont-want-you-to-see/.
The article you sited lists not just suicides and unintentional shootings, but also homicides in those numbers. How many are the criminals use of guns and how many are the suicides or accidental deaths? The article doesn’t say. However, according to http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/01/15/percentage-of-deaths-that-were-gun-related-in-2011-34-percent/ Breitbart, the number of gun related deaths (to include suicides, unintentional shootings, homicides) compared to the total number of deaths (by all sources) was less than one half of one percent or, 0.35% of all deaths were related to gun violence. I hope all of this gives you, and others, food for thought.
Good, glad to see that this man was able to defend himself. Even more revealed that he will not be changed.
Michael Oakes: The purpose of a well regulated militia was to keep one state from invading another. Individual state militias fought the Civil War. Since that time our military has become a federal entity. There are no longer state regiments. There is a great difference between a WELL REGULATED militia and an undisciplined, heavily armed populace. The article I cited most certainly did separate accidents, suicides and homicides. To compare those gun related deaths to all deaths, no matter what the cause, is completely ridiculous. Again most homicides are committed in a moment of rage by someone known to the victim. Relatively few are committed by a stranger. Here is food for thought. People die from cancer, we are working on a cure, People die of heart disease, we are working on a cure. People die in car accidents, we are working to make cars safer. Thousands of people are injured or killed by careless handling of legally owned guns and we are ignoring them.
Dude, you dont know your butt from a hole in the ground. You are SO IGNORANT I’m still in disbelief. NO, a “Standing Regulated Militia” was not created to be protected from “one state invading another” – Where the HELL did you go to school Moron?
bet he ain’t got nothing else to say HAHAHAHAHAHA