We know the leftist caricature of gun-rights advocates as stupid, poor, right-wing rednecks just isn’t true.
With socialists like Bernie Sanders insisting we shouldn’t be free to protect ourselves and supporting laws meant to prohibit citizens being armed in public, our right to defend ourselves and those we love is under attack.
When two white supremacists tried to take out their hatred by attacking a black man in a For Myers, Florida Waffle House restaurant they got what they deserved.
Bay Area Intifada shared some of the security camera footage that captured the action, as well as a local newscast with further information on the altercation.
Given the nature of the video, it’s appropriately age-restricted on YouTube and you can view it here on Truth And Action on the next page.
WATCH WHAT HAPPENED ON THE NEXT PAGE:
The man did what he had to do period.Good shot
Looks like at least one shot in the back. Can’t tell for sure.
You tell me what may have happened to that guy, if he was not armed? He was minding his own business! From watching the video, I agree his life was in danger.
THIS is the dumbest thing I’ve seen since the last time I saw a picture of George Bush. Gun nut losers own their guns because they are too afraid to go through life without them. I pity their cowardice. Get into a fight. Feel how it feels to throw and take a punch. Maybe you’ll learn that you don’t need a gun to protect you. I can’t even call people like this baddasses as a joke. They are, simply put, cowards and the alge that has formed at the top of the gene pool.
Aaron Webb tell that to the government, . a war is being fought for YOUR mind, and YOU are losing. wake up, or should i say, “baaahh, . baaahh bah’ “the right of the people” much? the government does not ALLOW a well regulated militia. strike one. the second amendment GIVES us nothing. it is simply an acknowlegement by the government that we, the people, have that “unalienable right’, and it shall not be infringed. not MAY not be infringed. strike two. when the fedgov givves up all its guns, including the police and military, as well as ALL criminals, then i would have no beef with your honorable method of battle. til then, strike three.
He had every right to shoot that thug. One guy had already punched him in the face, I would have done the exact same thing. It’s too bad the guy died though.
peace thru superior firepower. not once did they ever use this rifle to kill. the sight alone was enough.
George Paynich i eagerly await your rebuttal, sir.. (tho i have no real expectations of an actual, FACTUAL reply)
im just gonna go with the founders own words. It is the duty of the patriot to protect its country from its government.”
—Thomas Paine “It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.”
—Benjamin Franklin ‘our own free state” bad call buddy. the several states and the federal gov were two seperate entities. and the state trumped the fedgov. Bill of Rights, much? you probably think the civil war was fought over slavery. It seems indisputable that “the shot heard ’round the world” was, in part, fired to protect the right to keep and bear arms.[66] The New Englanders and the patriots in general recognized the crucial role that this right played in protecting all of their other rights. This included their right to alter and abolish tyrannical government which they felt compelled to exercise at that time. Furthermore, the colonists exercised both rights in the precise manner that Blackstone and [Page 214] Locke had outlined in their works; they did not resort to arms until the British Army attempted to violate their liberties by force.[67] and to finish. this didnt come from foxnews. it came straight from the prverbial horses mouth The Declaration further states that the main purpose of government is to insure that these rights are never infringed upon.[82] However, “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government.”[83] Even though the people have this right, Jefferson, the principal author of the Declaration, explained that “[p]rudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes.”[84] However, “when a long train of abuses and usurpation, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism,” argued Jefferson, “it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such Government, and provide new Guards for their future security.”[85] With the Declaration of Independence, the Continental Congress was vindicating the exercise of both the right to alter and abolish a despotic government and the right to keep and bear arms as prescribed by Blackstone and Locke.[86]
The Declaration of Independance further states that the main purpose of government is to insure that these rights are never infringed upon.[82] However, “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government.”[83] Even though the people have this right, Jefferson, the principal author of the Declaration, explained that “[p]rudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes.”[84] However, “when a long train of abuses and usurpation, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism,” argued Jefferson, “it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such Government, and provide new Guards for their future security.”[85] With the Declaration of Independence, the Continental Congress was vindicating the exercise of both the right to alter and abolish a despotic government and the right to keep and bear arms as prescribed by Blackstone and Locke.[86]