We know the leftist caricature of gun-rights advocates as stupid, poor, right-wing rednecks just isn’t true.
With socialists like Bernie Sanders insisting we shouldn’t be free to protect ourselves and supporting laws meant to prohibit citizens being armed in public, our right to defend ourselves and those we love is under attack.
When two white supremacists tried to take out their hatred by attacking a black man in a For Myers, Florida Waffle House restaurant they got what they deserved.
Bay Area Intifada shared some of the security camera footage that captured the action, as well as a local newscast with further information on the altercation.
Given the nature of the video, it’s appropriately age-restricted on YouTube and you can view it here on Truth And Action on the next page.
WATCH WHAT HAPPENED ON THE NEXT PAGE:
Why ask a cop. He’ll lie to protect himself instead of you.
Give it a week. Your wish might come true
Never mind the 2nd amendment, this is in Florida, where
This is not why the second amendment exists, however it is a benefit of having it !!!
Diego Sotelo Yes I watched the video. An unarmed white attacked a black man with a gun and the white got shot, so the black man is a hero. An unarmed black man attacks an armed police officer and the black man gets shot, the police officer is a racists cop. Double standard there. Makes you a racist when you say it is ok for the black man to shoot a white man but not ok when a white police officer shoots a black man.
in AZ you would have to reasonable prove that your life was in danger. pretty sure that would require an armed attacker. be careful people, laws are different everywhere.
Lee county cops smh dudes a convi ted felon, no charges thats b******t rip dakota
Phillip Guthrie Where I live, most people who carry concealed weapons are white. So if you have trouble with them. You had better be prepared to shoot or get shot.
How am I wrong Charles Ryan? I stated there wasn’t a conviction and then my opinion that if it weren’t a violent felony there should not be a problem ( with not having a restriction ) I should have be n more clear.
I do understand what the laws are now and I think they’re too restrictive. A kid that gets a non violent felony at 17 and walks the straight and narrow the rest of their life doesn’t deserve a fire arm restriction
I didn’t k ow there was a process to get your rights back but that’s a good thing