We know the leftist caricature of gun-rights advocates as stupid, poor, right-wing rednecks just isn’t true.
With socialists like Bernie Sanders insisting we shouldn’t be free to protect ourselves and supporting laws meant to prohibit citizens being armed in public, our right to defend ourselves and those we love is under attack.
When two white supremacists tried to take out their hatred by attacking a black man in a For Myers, Florida Waffle House restaurant they got what they deserved.
Bay Area Intifada shared some of the security camera footage that captured the action, as well as a local newscast with further information on the altercation.
Given the nature of the video, it’s appropriately age-restricted on YouTube and you can view it here on Truth And Action on the next page.
WATCH WHAT HAPPENED ON THE NEXT PAGE:
Careful study of history including roman and Jewish law. ( which our laws are based in). The main and sole purpose is quite simple. The keep the government in check. Sorry that you failed in history class.
Yes, the SCOTUS ruled on it but they were wrong, especially the f’ind idiot radical Scalia. You should read about it … For more than 200 years following the adoption of that amendment, federal judges uniformly understood that the right protected by that text was limited in two ways: First, it applied only to keeping and bearing arms for military purposes, and second, while it limited the power of the federal government, it did not impose any limit whatsoever on the power of states or local governments to regulate the ownership or use of firearms. What the 2nd Amendment really means when using proper grammar is: “Because a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”
For more than 200 years following the adoption of the 2nd Amendment, federal judges uniformly understood that the right protected by that text was limited in two ways: First, it applied only to keeping and bearing arms for military purposes, and second, while it limited the power of the federal government, it did not impose any limit whatsoever on the power of states or local governments to regulate the ownership or use of firearms. What the 2nd Amendment really means when using proper grammar is: “Because a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”
They got what they deserved,I highly doubt the person would be dead if he had kept his mouth shut and left the guys alone but they wanted to bully someone around and unfortunately for him the shooter wasn’t having it.I don’t blame him and I would have done the same thing no matter of skin color.Right is right
LOL, no not really what they had in mind when they were writing the constitution. Not at all.
less guns = safer for everyone overall = many many less murders in gun controlled 1st world countries around the world – no brainer
Not true at all. Violent crime rates in the US are down more and more every year even though legal gun owner ship soars to new highs every year. If you are just basing your opinion on the news channel reports instead of the actual crime data then I can see why you would believe your notion though. Proper research will show you that over history and up to present day, isolated crime rates go up in US cities that pass more gun control measures and the crime rates go down in cities that loosen gun control measures. Look it up in the FBI data and see for yourself.
Support http://www.facebook.com/marylandgunrights
This is why you should get your conceal carry. Good shoot!
Neither the second amendment, nor the police, actually protect you, from this kind of garbage….
However….
A firearm will….
A well armed society, is a polite society…..
The 2nd amendmaet has nothing to do with this.