The people of London overwhelmingly elected Sadiq Khan as the first Muslim mayor of a major Western European city. They did this despite many reports of past ties to Islamist extremists.
Liberal politicians across the European continent have long advocated for open borders throughout the European Union and praised the Islamification of much of the Western World.
Unfortunately for the innocent citizens of many of these countries, the liberals have gotten their way.
European Muslim extremists have freely traveled from Europe to caliphate territory in Iraq and Syria and back to Europe embedded within the hoards of migrants being ushered in.
Because many Middle Eastern and North African migrants refuse to assimilate into Western culture, they have no learned local languages, do not get a proper education, and resort to lives of crime and terrorism.
Mayor Khan, who visited the United States to express his support for Hillary Clinton during her campaing is hailing this refusal to assimilate as a good thing.
To read what Khan had to say about immigration — as well as why he is a “big fan” of the embattled Democratic presidential nominee — continue reading on the next page.
Hes an idiot…..
They don’t want to assimilate because they are in a new country to take over. The goal is for everyone to be a Muslim. They are doing a good job. Take notic
Well you fools sure picked a good one if you wanted isis to kill you off
Got to be a hoax!
London you sunk so low. You voted this yoyo Mayor, Bawaaaaaaa
Another moron, if they don’t assimilate then why are they there?
Dion Price our relative in England could not believe it when the largest mosque was built down the street from him and then there were more than he knew. The women who were not normally on the streets came out, some believed they were voting more than once. Just because the Mayor was Muslim now does not mean people knew it before. The element of surprise and not talking about it is a problem.
He is a damn idiot.
LONDON WHEN IS ENOUGH ENOUGH GET RID OF THIS TERRORIST YOU CALL A MAYOR
They don’t. That’s why you don’t allow them in! Sharia Law is not
Pro Civilization.
Don’t ever be fooled by the ‘tolerant” face of any Muslims you meet in the Western world ; muslim migration to conquer -is called ‘Hijrah’
~ to deceive, is called Taqiyya. Islam develops in four stages:
1. Evangelism.
2. Consolidation of power
3. Revolution
4. Islamic State
WAKE UP! Islam has not changed its methods for 1400 years.
Muslims are ‘tolerant’ when they are powerless,
but this false veneer will evaporate like steam from a smoking kettle when they think they are powerful enough –IF– –WE– –LET THEM– ”
PROOF: “Those who know nothing about Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those people are witless. Islam says: ‘Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all!’ Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by the infidel? Islam says: ‘Kill them, put them to the sword and scatter them.’
Islam says: ‘Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword.’ The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for the Holy Warriors! Does all this mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.” -Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
——————–
There are 109 verses in the quran which command muslims to kill infidels and it gives gruesome methods for carrying out your slaughter.
Moslems have been programmed since birth to raid and take lands they do not own —to conquer… It has been so for 1400 years.
They will kill you if they can. WAKE UP and help FIGHT BACK
HOW FOOLISH does one country have to BE?
Tolerating INVADERS? Wake the hell up damn fools
–they ARE ALL HERE to kill you: to them YOU are the “infidel”
” EVIL stares you right in the face….and as it walks by, and with all the garb it wears you have no way of knowing their intention -are they carrying a shiv ? –or a gun,–or a bomb under all that black and white cloth? Or maybe its just a ‘harmless’ pressure cooker’ ?
Only an IDIOT would find moslem infiltration ‘acceptable’ ”