The liberal gun-control agenda is a tiresome one. After numerous attempts to disarm the American population, most of which have ended in failure, they’re now targeting the rights of senior citizens to own weapons. At first thought most would think to equate it to the dangers of allowing senior citizens to keep their driver’s licenses. However, after further thought, you’ll find that in both of those cases the risks are exactly the same for anybody else. Everybody knows, especially if you’re from California, that most young people are awful/stupid drivers. At least senior citizens don’t break the speed limit . . . that often. As for gun control, the “fear” is that they’ll use them to commit suicide. Statistics show that a majority of gun-related suicide happens to younger people. So . . . again, the argument collapses on itself. But why not cling to the idea like a child clings to an action figure his parents won’t buy him at a toy store?
Shannon Frattaroli, a faculty member of John Hopkins University has pointed out that California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders provide a way for families to have guns confiscated from older relatives. I’m sure that was no accident, just like the sneakiness involves in passing California’s new gun laws. However, it could be dangerous for anybody trying do the confiscating.
Find out why on the next page.
Don’t think so give it up
senor citasens cant fire quick enough to be much uses on the battlefront…why not give there guns to kids what have a better chance of protecting are freedoms?
WHAT IS PUBLICLY FUNDED ?
B******t!
bullcrap
64 years old and still on target. Molon Labe.
You’re dumb.
Tyler Qualls *dum
do you have any proofs that was you?
I’m not in the habit of snapping pics of anyone elses targets. Ex Army Inf, 1 year as a mercenary in Rhodesia and finished up retiring from the Navy. The gunners mates used to ask me to zero the M-14s for them when we went to the range. I still have the same nail color on if you want to see that.