The late US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia had become not only a critic of the decisions that the liberal wing of the Supreme Court made, but a critic of the Supreme Court itself, calling the institution a “threat to American democracy.”
He also went so far as to support what is often referred to as a “conspiracy theory,” that FEMA camps are being established for the purpose of the detention of Americans, stating that Americans were “kidding themselves” if they didn’t believe that the camps and their nefarious purposes exist.
Clearly this talk was not coming from someone on the fringe of society, but from a man who was at the pinnacle of his profession — a US Supreme Court justice, no less. So when he made comments like these , it was not possible for opponents to write what he said off as the ravings of someone on the lunatic fringe. Scalia, by his position and stature, demanded attention, forcing his statements into the national discourse while offering support for ideas those on the left want hidden from the public.
His comments undoubtedly made him a lot of enemies on the left. Although it’s not a path we like to go down, given recent leaked emails, we have to think the unthinkable: Was a US Supreme Court justice assassinated because he had become a danger to those on the left and their agenda? That’s a very serious charge, and it demands a serious investigation and a discussion of what we now know. Something we will do on page two.
I truly believe there was a threat of having Scalia around and he was murdered. Will it take the “forces that be” 25 years to leak the truth to the American people?
This would not be new….JFK followed by RFK were CIA “wet work.”
HELLO, What email of podesta’s suggest the murder of scalia?
I wouldn’t put anything past the demorats. Look at Hillary’s record, anyone who opposes her or willing to testifie ends up looking at the grass from under side
Lost me at the second paragraph. Scalia NEVER suggested the existence of “FEMA camps” was real, much less to inter Americans. This article’s b******t.
Texas law required. 1. the sheriff to come out and investigate (did not happen) and 2 there had to be an autopsy (he was IMMEDIATELY cremated). Smells like assassination to me.
That is defiantly not a vineyard. No one irrigates a vineyard with a center pivot irrigation system.
I called it murder on day one. This one was obvious.
So tell me, what did this murder accomplish? He was replaced by another Constitutionalist and the court remains unchanged. If you shorten someones life, there should be a purpose. I never understood why he was at a “Democratic” Texas Ranch to begin with. How did they get him there? It’s evident that it was all planned with all the accessories to murder lined up. Did he go willingly or was he taken there?????
it was all to hurried up & no autopsy, ” WHY”????.so how did he die?????? what exactly caused his death?????? where was his family that they didn’t know what caused his death.??????? to many questions with no answers.