The Texas rancher was living his worst nightmare. He was embroiled in an income tax case with the federal government that was intent on foreclosing on his ranch, taking everything and leaving nothing due to unpaid liens.
The rancher’s effort to fight back turned the incident into a landmark case. On September 14, 2015, he filed a petition in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138 that challenged the Constitutional authority of the feds to usurp the authority of the courts in Tyler County, Texas.
The United States had 14 days to respond, but remained silent, apparently the first and only time that the government failed to respond to a jurisdiction challenge.
The rancher was not dissuaded. On September 30, 2015, he filed a Demand for Dismissal. Again, there was no response. How can the worst nightmare become even worse? The rancher will likely answer that when the Federal Court in conjunction with the IRS is trying to illegally seize your property while ignoring your legal rights, this is about as bad as your nightmare can be.
All within the rights of the rancher, his petition claimed that the Federal Court lacked the territorial and personal jurisdiction in Tyler Country, Texas, and demanded a dismissal of the case. The text of the petition indicated that the law was on his side.
Read the next page to find out what happened to the Texas rancher and to the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
As I said on the site, if these fellows keep insisting true authority is at the barrel end of a rifle, the minority elite better start considering the consequences. At some point, people are going to wise up and stop whacking at the branches and start cutting the root.
When will our justice system start giving us justice?
Should be called Bull shi- and idiots
Welcome to our false Judicial system
When the US flag with a gold fringe representing maritime (martial) law flies in a courtroom, the Constitution only applies when they want it to apply. Many Sheriffs won’t allow a gold fringed flag in a courtroom under their jurisdiction.
So, a friend of mine of 24 years, deleted me on FB because I supported Trump. Back in 1993, she gave me her famous and best ever cookie recipe. We’ve renamed them Trump Cookies and I’m going to share…..
Preheat oven to 350 degrees
Mix until fluffy: 2 sticks softened butter, 1/4 c brown sugar, 3/4 c sugar
Add to mix: 2 tsp vanilla extract, 2 eggs
In a separate bowl, mix: 2 and 1/4 c flour, 1 tsp baking soda and 1/2 tsp salt.
Add flour mixture to butter mixture slowly while beating with a mixer. If desired, fold in 1 c raisins, walnuts, chocolate chips or peanut butter.
Bake for 9-11 minutes until the edges are brown, they will finish cooking on the baking sheet. Store in a closed container with a slice of bread to keep them soft.
ENJOY the TRUMP COOKIES!!!
This is a must read.
I’m not calling b******t, id like to see the legal precedence that they’re using as well as a laid out breakdown of the laws and statutes violated before deciding what to think on this one. If you guys didn’t spend so much time with assumptive writing I for one would appreciate that. Otherwise keep reporting and I’ll keep reading.
Sounds like the rancher created an llc to insulate himself from his business.
And then the courts would not accept himself in representation as a corporation must provide legal counsel and cannot defend itself in court. Representation of one’s self only applies in personal matters.
So since no legal counsel had shown up for any proceedings, the courts took the land from the corporation. This rancher was trying to be the lawyer for his corporation.
Well, if you want to use the shelter of an llc then you have to follow the rules of an llc.
Sounds like the govt was taking down a corporation for tax evasion and not the rancher personally.
Read up on this before you form an opinion.
Reading your comment, it sounds to me like your the one making assumptions.
i think they usurp power because they were never granted ownership of the money the article of the constitution says they can set the monetary value but it doesn’t belong to them