The Texas rancher was living his worst nightmare. He was embroiled in an income tax case with the federal government that was intent on foreclosing on his ranch, taking everything and leaving nothing due to unpaid liens.
The rancher’s effort to fight back turned the incident into a landmark case. On September 14, 2015, he filed a petition in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138 that challenged the Constitutional authority of the feds to usurp the authority of the courts in Tyler County, Texas.
The United States had 14 days to respond, but remained silent, apparently the first and only time that the government failed to respond to a jurisdiction challenge.
The rancher was not dissuaded. On September 30, 2015, he filed a Demand for Dismissal. Again, there was no response. How can the worst nightmare become even worse? The rancher will likely answer that when the Federal Court in conjunction with the IRS is trying to illegally seize your property while ignoring your legal rights, this is about as bad as your nightmare can be.
All within the rights of the rancher, his petition claimed that the Federal Court lacked the territorial and personal jurisdiction in Tyler Country, Texas, and demanded a dismissal of the case. The text of the petition indicated that the law was on his side.
Read the next page to find out what happened to the Texas rancher and to the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
the facts are in the constitution and constitutional law, read up and you will unferstand
Term limits will take a Constitutional amendment.
They are sitting in jail in Nevada, awaiting trial for the 2014 incident. They were found not guilty in Oregon.
Justice Thomas has said the SCOTUS needs to get back to business and stop making law. Their job is to interpret, not make laws. I hope he gets that job done.
Is this more if that f**e news I’ve been hearing so much about? Yep.
Is that like sending classified emails before updating federal departments? Being a network court trying to rule on money owed federally seems pretty wrong when liens can be put on a property by anyone, but I don’t think the branch filing should get to make the decision. Federal likes to assume sometimes. Half logic type rulings. They don’t seem to be big fans of textbooks when it comes to hype.
So lets make this clear.. He is using the authority of the federal govt, as described by the constitution, to claim the federal govt. as no jurisdiction….lol you people are funny lol
Actually it is just as funny as using an amendment to the constitution that has nothing to do with marriage and using that to federalize marriage.
That may be asking a lot.
Bundys
He pointed a gun at law enforcement officer. He was using land illegall, why do not you believe that white people do not have to follow the law?