The Texas rancher was living his worst nightmare. He was embroiled in an income tax case with the federal government that was intent on foreclosing on his ranch, taking everything and leaving nothing due to unpaid liens.
The rancher’s effort to fight back turned the incident into a landmark case. On September 14, 2015, he filed a petition in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138 that challenged the Constitutional authority of the feds to usurp the authority of the courts in Tyler County, Texas.
The United States had 14 days to respond, but remained silent, apparently the first and only time that the government failed to respond to a jurisdiction challenge.
The rancher was not dissuaded. On September 30, 2015, he filed a Demand for Dismissal. Again, there was no response. How can the worst nightmare become even worse? The rancher will likely answer that when the Federal Court in conjunction with the IRS is trying to illegally seize your property while ignoring your legal rights, this is about as bad as your nightmare can be.
All within the rights of the rancher, his petition claimed that the Federal Court lacked the territorial and personal jurisdiction in Tyler Country, Texas, and demanded a dismissal of the case. The text of the petition indicated that the law was on his side.
Read the next page to find out what happened to the Texas rancher and to the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
I totally agree. These trash rag websites never come out of hiding. But the things people believe and interpret from a headline is unbelievable.
If there is an American child sitting at a school table without food the shame is on the parent who will not apply for assistance. Do you believe that children whose fathers lost jobs and were on unemployment were allowed to not eat at public school tables?
I wonder which one of the four states he lived in? How many people did he spread the message to?
Don’t care if you forget or not. As long as you let the past control your future you don’t have a future.
To the victors go the spoils.. The “pale skins” won the war so now they own the lands. As all wars go the winners take all..
Fact is the “pale skins” won the war so they became the owners of the land as it goes with all wars, “to the victors goes the spoils”
They won what war??? This land is stilled not settled, that’s why all the hate, and it is you pale DEVIL’S, that’s the perpetrators of this hate, in you attempt to rule the Land, you won no War, there was no War, trickery and deceit, nothing but lies, and Our belief that you people dealt in sincerity, to Our temporary demise, read some case law, on how you pale skins came to be in this land, and the methods used, War is far from the TRUTH.
This day it has been revealed it was thru some legal things not War, now that the system has matured, and the Natives that went into slavery are waking, the current in North America is changing, and the so called white man, us Finding it difficult to deal in Equality, to his demise, as the World has grown away from EUROPEANISATION to NATIVITY, and the Pale Skin is finding himself outside his NATIVITY and out of place in others Lands.
Look at it how you might, the TRUTH is Live and all must live by it, you mad at the POPE, the PRESIDENT, the NATIVE, the MUSLIM, and even at YOURSELVES, and this is the root of the EVIL, IT IS OVER.
ALMIGHTY
Puritans fled England to avoid religious persecution.
Puritans drafted their own Constitution to create a Theocratic Government in mid to late 1600s.
In the late 1700s, the founding fathers drafted theie own Constitution separating Church and state in government, which is what the US we know today is founded upon.
Separation of Church and State is meant to be exactly that: The Church has no power or authority to govern citizens and the States don’t say how, when, or if you choose to worship a higher power.
What complete and utter b******t. The claim: “The reason is that any response in writing to the Petitioner’s filings—whether for or against Petitioner—will substantiate treason to the Constitution, not only on his part, but on the part of every other federal judge and DOJ attorney practicing anywhere in the Union.” shows the level of b******t, because the Constitution, Article 3, section 3 defines treason thusly: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.” Not the words “only” and “overt act”.
The author then goes on to say, “Inasmuch as the penalty for Constitution treason is death, there was a method to his muteness.” But the Constitution says, “The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.” There is nothing in the Constitution about death for “Constitution treason”.
If the author hasn’t even read the Constitution, then how can I trust the rest of his b******t?
Gaza Strip is a “Death Camp” for Palestinians created by Apartheid Israel since Israel subsequently blockaded the Strip and launched assaults against it in 2008–2009, 2012 and 2014 & 2016 Israel has deprived Palestinians of their human rights by conducting violent military raids, extra-judicial executions, widespread arrests, detention and torture
https://www.facebook.com/vivapalestinamalaysia/posts/10154168087684518The