The Texas rancher was living his worst nightmare. He was embroiled in an income tax case with the federal government that was intent on foreclosing on his ranch, taking everything and leaving nothing due to unpaid liens.
The rancher’s effort to fight back turned the incident into a landmark case. On September 14, 2015, he filed a petition in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138 that challenged the Constitutional authority of the feds to usurp the authority of the courts in Tyler County, Texas.
The United States had 14 days to respond, but remained silent, apparently the first and only time that the government failed to respond to a jurisdiction challenge.
The rancher was not dissuaded. On September 30, 2015, he filed a Demand for Dismissal. Again, there was no response. How can the worst nightmare become even worse? The rancher will likely answer that when the Federal Court in conjunction with the IRS is trying to illegally seize your property while ignoring your legal rights, this is about as bad as your nightmare can be.
All within the rights of the rancher, his petition claimed that the Federal Court lacked the territorial and personal jurisdiction in Tyler Country, Texas, and demanded a dismissal of the case. The text of the petition indicated that the law was on his side.
Read the next page to find out what happened to the Texas rancher and to the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
This page needs to stop saying anything true. Yall make it look bad
Admiralty Law rules the land since 1871. Commercial Codes and the Administrators of the UCC, I.E. “Courts”, are not Representatives of anything resembling Judicial Law.
The fact remains only 20 States legally Ratified the 16th. Amendment where 36 was required.
The Republic, long hijacked at the end of The Civil War, no longer exists. The only c**p being spewed here are from those whom are only inept enough to click a search button for answers instead of actually researching or reading.
And it is not surprising Shills and Trolls working for the Alphabet soup companies are Rampant here as well.
Ok prejudice redskin .my skin is pale. A lot of my ancestors are native . GOD OWNS ALL THE LAND and know other man pale ,red,brown,or black should think they have a right to where someone else wants to go ! Period
Nah…..It was about tariffs – not slavery.
The proposed Corwin Amendment and Emancipation Proclamation both made it clear that slavery was perfectly alright……as long as one remained loyal to the US government.
Well that was a waste of thirty seconds of my life to read.
Exactly when did Pennsylvania declare an intent to secede over the federal taxation of whisky?
Had the state of Pennsylvania announced it was seceding from the union, my belief is Washington would not have used force to keep the state in the union.
After all, giving the federal government the authority to use force against the states was brought up during the Constitutional Convention twice and both times it was voted down to not give the federal government any such authority.
Washington was a stickler for adhering to both the letter and the intent of the Constitution.
You are basically deliberately conflating resistance to paying taxes by a specific group, with the entirety of a state determining it will leave a voluntary union just as the colony of Pennsylvania had previously decided to secede from the British Empire.
Apples and oranges.
The land is granted to Man Thur UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES, the Origin of the Pale skin, is the dankie caves of North West Asia/Europe, and to deny this us the cause if the great distress upon the Earth, it is the Pakeskin forcing himself into places, then trying to suppress the Rights of the People of the Land, thru violent acts, lies and other forms of treachery.
The denial of the pale man of the error of his way, is the root to the greatest EVILS on Earth, the same as ROME lynching Jesus for not accepting them as His Authority, as they were FOREIGNERS in the Land, same People, different area and new era of time, same hatred, from the sane people, doing the same thing, ” colonizing” and “,invading” the Homes of others.
You were not give this land, your fathers were granted certain land, East of the Appalachian, but the broke away from there crown government, then violated every treaty ever signed..
Of course its senseless to you all you are the perpetrator of the Heinous Act, but to Us who this Land was give, you are Invaders, who have brought death, destruction and inhumanity to the Land.
ALMIGHTY
You’re a dumbass. Even as the “pale skin” colonists, the colonies existed before the government did, erego, pale skins owe no allegiance, we shrugged off mandatory “allegiance” when kicking king georgie to the curb. All Indian historical issues can be traced back to broken promises and failed treaties fouled up by that same government you think the pale skins owe allegiance to.
Scottie Miller did you read the fact pattern. One individual failed to,pay a federal debt and insists that the federal government proceed in state court. Well, it didn’t work that way in Washington’s time and it doesn’t work that way now.
Lincoln settled the question of secession.
Um, so how come all of you don’t have to do your civic duty, but I do?