Can you imagine what it would be like to enter the brain of an elected democrat? It would be like falling into a blender or walking through an episode of the Twilight zone. It would put any logical thinker in a straight-jacket or leave them in a corner rocking back and forth from the sheer mental terror they’ve just experienced. Where they see reasonable thinking, all reasonable people see is unlikely comparisons. Take for example a bill proposed by Rep. Mary Lou Marzian, a democrat from Louisville, KY. She proposed that men who need Viagara or similar drugs to treat erectile dysfunction should need permission from their wives.
Well, what if they’re not married? She said the bill was meant to be a response to Kentucky’s recent adoption of a bill that would require women to see a doctor before having an abortion. Like everything else that liberals come up with to demonstrate their lack of thinking, this doesn’t make any sense. How is erectile dysfunction even comparable to abortion? One involves human life and the other involves stage fright (though the use of one can result the in the other). Then again, what’s so unreasonable about requiring a doctor’s visit?
Find out on the next page.
OK and women now have to get husbands permission to get birth control or have an abortion??? WTF is wrong with these politicians
How does the store that’s selling Viagra know if the guy is married?
Pictures don’t lie. Yikes!!!!!!?
This is proof of Kentucky Government wasting taxpayer’s money. This should not have gone any further than a thought. But to actually being written and submitted to become a law is ludicrous. And if it makes law, then they will have to write procedures for prosecution and what the penalty for the violation would be. This bill, if it makes law would violate privacy laws such as, doctor to patient privacy, and individuals privacy. And there is already a woman’s Viagra, so will this mean they will have to write another bill for woman to get husbands permission before buying Viagra. There is already a law in effect that controls the end result of Viagra, if the wife says no to sex then the man can be charged with rape. She does not have any right to control what prescriptions a man can take, nor does the man have the right to control what a woman takes. It is their body and they have a right to privacy.
Where’s your sense of humor?
Hmmm something about my body my choice comes to my minde
This was introduced by that pro Baby Killing$#%&!@*that thinks murdering babies and calling it Womens health care with Our Tax Dollars is OK.
Kentucky believes in insest ! Why should that even be a topic there ?
Who proposed this ? A Lesbian ?
Liberals have gotten to be just silly! There are no other words for what they just did, Silly, silly, silly.