The mainstream media’s contempt for gun owners was on blatant display in an incredibly one-side interview with journalist Katie Couric.
Speaking to Matt Lauer on Today, Couric hawked her new anti-gun documentary Under The Gun, which supposedly looks at the issue of gun ownership from both sides but by the sound of it repeats the same old canards that liberals invoke against firearms owners.
Abandoning any pretense of objectivity, Lauer gushed over Couric and her film throughout the interview, sanctimoniously declaring that he was sure “something” would be done after the Sandy Hook killings and was shocked when no action was taken against guns.
Couric, for her part, indulged Lauer’s sanctimony, weaving a conspiracy theory about the NRA brainwashing it’s members and controlling Congress to prevent anti-gun measures from passing.
But the biggest “WTF” moment of the interview came when Lauer asked Couric about how the documentary handled accounts of people using firearms to defend themselves
See Couric’s absurd answer on the next page:
And ma’am you don’t have an ounce of wisdom in you. Sheer foolishness!
Dumb
Yes they are. If you remember that brown haired teacher that was supposedly shot, she somehow got shot st two other supposed mass shooting right after sandy hook, and two different children were used in a couple of more supposed mass shootings. So yes I agree there are way to many holes for it to be legitimate.
Ignore this twit…
stupid asshole
This is one$#%&!@*nobody needs to assist or defend.
Every legal gun owner must vote Trump
Stupid liberal!
Mike Hill I am a member of the legal gun owners group several times over. NK will not be invading the US, and my owning firearms has nothing to do with that. You take a page from the progressive playbook focusing on what I didn’t say instead. Redirecting the argument doesn’t make me wrong, or an idiot. I said nothing about Russia nor the UN so settle down angry man and focus on what’s there instead of what isn’t. Oh, it’s “bearing” btw. “Idiot” out….
And one should give anything she says credibility why????