The mainstream media’s contempt for gun owners was on blatant display in an incredibly one-side interview with journalist Katie Couric.
Speaking to Matt Lauer on Today, Couric hawked her new anti-gun documentary Under The Gun, which supposedly looks at the issue of gun ownership from both sides but by the sound of it repeats the same old canards that liberals invoke against firearms owners.
Abandoning any pretense of objectivity, Lauer gushed over Couric and her film throughout the interview, sanctimoniously declaring that he was sure “something” would be done after the Sandy Hook killings and was shocked when no action was taken against guns.
Couric, for her part, indulged Lauer’s sanctimony, weaving a conspiracy theory about the NRA brainwashing it’s members and controlling Congress to prevent anti-gun measures from passing.
But the biggest “WTF” moment of the interview came when Lauer asked Couric about how the documentary handled accounts of people using firearms to defend themselves
See Couric’s absurd answer on the next page:
SMH
Most of those who say disarm have their own security that carries guns for their protection. Tell you what cupcake, you get rid of your gun toting security permanently and them we’ll talk about it. 😉
Funny.. It’s always been that way from days of old. Why would you be defenseless against a threat if you have two brain cells in your head..
It really doesn’t matter what she or anyone else thinks. Americans have the right to bare arms and that will not change.
How many armed guards do you have, idiot?
hope your daughter saved by gun carry makes u fall and pray for forgivness
When the government wants to take your guns, that should tell you something bad is on the horizon.
Idiot.
She is, at most, a specious reporter.
Couric, no longer a “reporter” but a paid propagandis. Lies from the left.