A judge upheld the harsh punishment of a student for “disruptive” classroom behavior.
In almost any other circumstance, you’d read that previous sentence and wonder what all the fuss is about. After all, making sure students do not engage in inappropriate or even dangerous behavior is something that we expect educators to do. But when you consider what the school in question decided was “disruptive” behavior, you’ll understand why people are raising such a fuss.
Back in 2013, second grader Joshua Welch chewed a pastry he brought for breakfast into the shape of a gun, pretending to fire it as young boys are wont to. That would have been the end of it, hadn’t administrators took it upon themselves to investigate this serious matter and conclude that Welch had committed a major offense.
As punishment for this act of infamy, the school suspended the hapless student, a punishment regarded as disproportionate by many but somehow found reasonable by a circuit judge.
Read more on the next page:
BULLSHET !!!! Judge has to out of his mind !
How stupid can educators get?
How many rounds of sprinkles were fired?????
The judge in this case is a very special stupid case. I had toy guns as a kid, running around playing good guy and bad guy. I owned my first real weapon at age 12. Sinse then I nevever had the desire or will to shoot anyone unless it was withinin my Constitutional rights. The judge needs to consentrate on real criminals not kids with POP TARTS.
How stupid
The Judge Is A Obozo Type Of Democrat!
Court time was wasted on this?
I have made 2comments on this today ,both have been pulled FU facebook
Really, a pop tart gun, kid should of eaten the evidence.
This is why children become
Paranoid Schizophrenic. And grow up to have no respect for authority. If anyone is in the wrong here it is this judge. He should be charged with Mental Abuse Of A Minor. As well the educators who initiated this action in the 1st place.