In their continuing effort to discredit the election of Donald Trump, Clinton apparatchiks such as John Podesta and other DNC luminaries continue to press the “Russian hacking” theory. That this is the best they can muster is a measure of their failure to find any irregularities might have hurt Hillary’s chances of winning.
Recall that the theory being proposed by Podesta and others is that Russia, in its desire to see Donald Trump elected, hacked into DNC email systems and forwarded damaging materials to WikiLeaks for subsequent publication on the internet. Based on this thin reed, a group of Democratic electors has requested that an intelligence briefing be made available to all electors prior to their vote on Monday.
Judge Napolitano weighed in on this subject with a shocking theory of his own found on page two.
The corruption just keeps on coming!
he is the smartest judge
That is not true!!
Don Taylor but easy to tell these s cumbags are republican voters
Mars!
Hillary lacks good judgment. She is a threat to national security and a liability to the nation as a whole.
Hillary must be charged and imprisoned for using her position as secritary of state for racketeering, money laundering, treason, voter fraud and attempting to overthrow the government of the United States and it’s constitution.
18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code
Notes
prev | next
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Ha ha ha the national review omg that’s funny
Once you feel avoided by someone, never disturb them again. Because the one who think that you are disturbing them, will never know how much you care for them.
Why is it when someone, anyone had a theory that supports Trumps view that it wasn’t the Russians who were responsible for the hacking all these right wing sites accept them as credible? Is this judge an expert in hacking? When the CIA, the FBI, almost every US Senator and 17 other intelligence agencies all come to the same conclusion, independently, I might add, were just supposed to ignore their findings?
You mean the same folks that let Hillary slide because she is above the law and the same crowd that was certain Trump would never be president, yeah I’d believe them. They have zero proof. None.