Judge Moore’s Battle is With Media and Not His Accusers

A video presentation on YouTube by Bombard has analyzed the press encounter with Judge Roy Moore and his supporters where he is speaking about the accusation by Beverly Young Nelson that he sexually abused her when she was 16 years old.

The woman who is now being passed around the media circus by Gloria Allred who is apparently looking for her next meal train, has made these accusations after another woman, Leigh Corfman, was badgered by the Washington Post reporters, lawyers and editors to come forward with her story.

The Bombard video presentation has analyzed the judge’s body language as a way to look at his sincerity and his manner in denying these accusations.

In a video posted to YouTube on Tuesday, body language expert Bombard analyzed Judge Roy Moore’s facial expressions and eye movements as he denied the sexual harassment allegations made by Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson. 

Bombard concluded Judge Moore’s denial was “genuine.”

Bombard notes Moore keeps perfect eye contact with various members of the crowd.

“He looks at everybody — that’s good!”, says Bombard.

Bombard then goes on to note as Moore touches on the allegations that he’s clearly disgusted by the claims as he’s talking out of the side of his mouth.

Moore puts genuine emphasis on his words, while his speech is in-sync with his body movements.

Bombard notes Moore is not stiff while fighting back against the allegations.
“He’s being genuine and looking at those who are looking at him,” adds Bombard. 

Nelson, 56, held a press conference in New York with embattled attorney Gloria Allred on Monday, alleging Judge Roy Moore sexually harassed her when she was 16 years old.

On Monday evening, Judge Moore vehemently denied Nelson’s accusations.

Here’s what he told the press:

MOORE: “Thank ya’ll for being here tonight. Thank-you to all the people have came out at this late hour and for being here. I want to address what’s been brought out on television today by Gloria Allred and a client she has about things I allegedly did. I want to make it perfectly clear, the people of Alabama know me, they know my character, they know what I’ve stood for in the political world for over 40-years. I can tell you without hesitation, this is absolutely false. I never did what she said I did. I don’t even know the woman. I don’t know anything about her. I don’t even know where the restaurant is or was. If you look at this situation you’ll see because I’m eleven or ten points or eleven points ahead, this race being just 28 days off, that this is a political maneuver and has nothing to do with reality. It’s all about politics.”

Obviously, much of this evidence toward exoneration is anecdotal and it’s always difficult in very old accusations to ascertain the truth when you’re merely dealing with he said/she said information.  For the Washington Post to go full tilt at this storyline just weeks before an election that could possibly put a man in office in the Senate who is someone with core beliefs directly in contradiction with those of the Left is mightily suspicious, especially when we’re talking about allegations without any other evidence than spoken testimony and after having been silent for four decades.

If it turns out that the judge is guilty, by some admission or other hard evidence surfaces, then, by all means, he should be removed from office…if he successfully pulls a Donald Trump and is able to rise above the allegations of misconduct thrown at him from every conceivable direction.

Notice however the selective reporting here when an actual sitting Senator, Bob Menendez, is on trial for conduct that is absolutely horrid, yet whose coverage is enjoying an almost across-the-board media blackout.

Menendez, of course, happens to be a Democrat.

Source:  Breitbart / Gateway Pundit 1 / Gateway Pundit 2 / Gateway Pundit 3