There have been numbers conspiracies regarding the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, but nearly all of them hinge on the oft-touted fact that the temperature at which jet fuel burns is significantly lower than the temperature at which steel melts.
Well, an iron worker on YouTube is causing quite a stir among people who believe that the towers were not, in fact, brought down by the jets flown into them.
In the video, the man attempts to debunk the theory that structural steel would remain strong at the temperature at which jet fuel burns by heating a peace of structural metal to that very temperature and bending it easily.
Move on to page 2 for the video:
building seven was on fire more seriously than others. Not an inferno yet but bad enough that that was the quickest way to stop it from spreading.
If it were a controlled collapse or Implosion so to speak wouldn’t it collapse from the bottom up not from the top down? Like the buildings in vegas did when they imploded that hotel years ago?
Another nobody wanting to be famous on the internet
Dana Kerr, the history channel? Really?
ahahahahahahahaha! Another moron to laugh at HURRAY!!!! 🙂
But why didn’t it tip over? All of the beams just happen to collapse at exactly the same time? I am no rocket scientist but it really doesn’t make sense.
The NY at the time said #7 was going to be demo’ed due to stability concerns
Im sorry but Dana Kerrb is right. But not gonna argue with fools. Good day
Lol.. world trade center was a whole lot more steel and several other components, such as wire, plastic, carpet, ect..
This dude is clueless..
Well for one thing it’s much different having concrete wrap around the steel with no oxygen in between another building seven did not collapse on its own they took it down which means they had commercial demolitions Inc. CDI come in to demo the building my biggest question was what were they doing there already on site that’s all.