There have been numbers conspiracies regarding the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, but nearly all of them hinge on the oft-touted fact that the temperature at which jet fuel burns is significantly lower than the temperature at which steel melts.
Well, an iron worker on YouTube is causing quite a stir among people who believe that the towers were not, in fact, brought down by the jets flown into them.
In the video, the man attempts to debunk the theory that structural steel would remain strong at the temperature at which jet fuel burns by heating a peace of structural metal to that very temperature and bending it easily.
Move on to page 2 for the video:
When you find yourself angry, your usually protecting false ideology…kinda like a drugs addict defending there addiction
Yes, some of them were. B25 hit the Empire State Building and burned for hours.
not building 7, and when the towers where constructed they were built with a reinforced core so both building could with stand multiple crashes from 707s
Notice how the collapse cut such straight lines in that steel.
2 to be exact
so then the building would have fell sideways and not imploded
My torpedo heater running on scary sounding “jet fuel” should’ve fallen to the center of the earth by now.
No building has ever fallen from an air plane hit, let alone free falling twice in two puddles on the ground, oh don’t forget the fbi building that also free fell a block away from a gas explosion, no building has ever free fallen from a single explosion that I can find
…lmao…
Jet fuel is basically diesel. Go ahead, pour a puddle and try to light it.