There have been numbers conspiracies regarding the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, but nearly all of them hinge on the oft-touted fact that the temperature at which jet fuel burns is significantly lower than the temperature at which steel melts.
Well, an iron worker on YouTube is causing quite a stir among people who believe that the towers were not, in fact, brought down by the jets flown into them.
In the video, the man attempts to debunk the theory that structural steel would remain strong at the temperature at which jet fuel burns by heating a peace of structural metal to that very temperature and bending it easily.
Move on to page 2 for the video:
Still doesn’t explain global collapse of the towers, but he makes a somewhat valid demonstration. Like he said, hes not trying to prove or disprove any other theories.
then please explain out of every steel skyscraper building that has ever burned (some up to 18 hours) why did building 1,2, and 7 fall in free fall in a controlled demolishen style
Yeah there slap nuts why did building 7 fall like a rock from the sky, morpn.
Yawn
Yeah you’re a retard. The metal is only 20% hotter than it would have been. Also a few floors burning at the top weakening the steel wool no way make a building collapse the way it did. There have been fires that have raged for days in sky scrapers and still stand.
Building seven was a cantilevered load that barely passed engineering when it was built. It didn’t take much heat to stress the supports and cause a total collapse.
Engendered steel buildings are designed and built to the very limits of engineering. That being said and deterioration of structural integrity by heat is simply catastrophic.
What about all the other steal that never touched the flame and ended up in a puddle on the ground..melting people’s shoes too the surface a month later
Building 7 was on five. Do your research.
Were all those buildings hit by planes, too? Didn’t think so.