His argument is that, while the facts are indeed true, steel doesn’t melt at the temperate felt within the Twin Towers, it’s structural rigidity is lessened significantly.
In short, steel doesn’t need to turn to liquid to lose it’s ability to remain structurally sound.
There are, of course, many arguments counter to the iron worker’s claims: the temperature that he heated the steel is unverifiable, the steel he used is significantly thinner than the steel in the towers, the length of time he heated the steel could very well have been longer than the short amount of times the towers burned, etc.
The stir this man has created, however, is significant. Check out the video below and make your own conclusions.
Source: IJ Review
9/11 was a government plan.
The man is a simpleton and shill. He’s asserting that every piece of steel in the towers was subject to intense fire, It wasn’t, and therefore should not have collapsed unless it was a controlled demolition.
I own a metallurgical testing company and know a little about what happens to steel when you heat it. It is called annealing the steel. This makes the yield point of the steel much lower. If this happened to the supporting steel beams in the building, the weight of the structure above could cause the building to come down. It is the same principle that allows black smiths to manipulate the shape of heated metal. The strength returns once you rapidly cool the heated metal by immersing it in a liquid. I also believe as hated as Goerge W. Bush is by the main stream media and the left, that there is no way a secret like this could not be exposed.
Lots of things I could say.
Since any half-wit knows that something very unethical and corrupted went down(and only a mere months after that crooked piece of s**t bought the WTC towers, then slammed an-almost unheard of insurance policy for terrorism).
But even if this guy just proved that the temperatures would have significantly lessened the steel’s structural composition….
The towers fell straight down.
Not to the left.
Not the right.
Not in any angled direction.
Straight down. Trying setting a Jenga stack on fire, and even with wood that will disappear, it will still topple over. That’s a very incompetent example of what’s not an incompetent display of common sense.
STRAIGHT DOWN.
If the structure was weakened(and I’m sure it was, clearly), it would have toppled over. Not collapse on itself.