Finally. An authority figure with real-life experience has stated that modern Islamic terrorism has changed the landscape, and the public must participate in their own defense. Liberal professors postulate, and Democrat politicians with security details wring their hands and insist that “safe zones” and “gun-free zones” will keep everyone safe from evil guns that apparently fire themselves.
Former Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble, who previously headed up all law enforcement for the U.S. Treasury Department, had a different take on how the public should respond to terrorism. He made his comments after last month’s deadly al-Shabab attack at the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, Kenya, and suggested that the most logical answer might be the arming of civilians.
That undoubtedly will have liberals crying in frustration because it is the opposite of what they want to hear.
Read Noble’s other comments on page 2:
Hey, I would defend myself if I had a gun, believe me! I just stated the sad truth about what the Left is trying to do and will do if Hillary wins. What’s worse, is O signed another executive order, stating that anyone receiving social security can’t have a gun.
Isreal has be it doing for its whole existance.only way to control muslims.
I feel the same way, but we’re being watched.
http://toprightnews.com/
http://toprightnews.com/obamas-gun-control-orders-contains-a-ban-on-guns-for-some-social-security-beneficiaries/
An armed citizenry. Another grandchild.
Your dam right , our government may be run by cowards and terrorist but our people are strong defiant and fearless .
AMERICANS FIGURED THAT OUT IN 1776.
No perhaps about it, it is our only defense, given the sad state of the Federal Government.
Amen