Finally. An authority figure with real-life experience has stated that modern Islamic terrorism has changed the landscape, and the public must participate in their own defense. Liberal professors postulate, and Democrat politicians with security details wring their hands and insist that “safe zones” and “gun-free zones” will keep everyone safe from evil guns that apparently fire themselves.
Former Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble, who previously headed up all law enforcement for the U.S. Treasury Department, had a different take on how the public should respond to terrorism. He made his comments after last month’s deadly al-Shabab attack at the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, Kenya, and suggested that the most logical answer might be the arming of civilians.
That undoubtedly will have liberals crying in frustration because it is the opposite of what they want to hear.
Read Noble’s other comments on page 2:
America listen to this man,never give up your gun’s.
Why is it always just “terrorism”?
Why not tyranny?
You can let them take your guns if you would like but let me ask you something, why would you even own them if you don’t plan on defending them or fighting for your God given rights Candise?
they know that being armed gives us the power to fight back. thats why the criminal democrats in power want to disarm us.
I agree. If there had been an armed guard at sandy hook those sweet angels would possibly be alive today. So sad.
Ralph Severe Because it’s based upon France not the United States.
How many might view our government as “terrorist”?
what would an unarmed america be able to do, nothing, thats why you should vote trump and the 2nd amendment
Damn straight spanky.
A WELL armed citizenry!!