Finally. An authority figure with real-life experience has stated that modern Islamic terrorism has changed the landscape, and the public must participate in their own defense. Liberal professors postulate, and Democrat politicians with security details wring their hands and insist that “safe zones” and “gun-free zones” will keep everyone safe from evil guns that apparently fire themselves.
Former Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble, who previously headed up all law enforcement for the U.S. Treasury Department, had a different take on how the public should respond to terrorism. He made his comments after last month’s deadly al-Shabab attack at the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, Kenya, and suggested that the most logical answer might be the arming of civilians.
That undoubtedly will have liberals crying in frustration because it is the opposite of what they want to hear.
Read Noble’s other comments on page 2:
yes he’s right but he will probably have an accident soon.
And he hopefully will not get ON her bad list.
You mean the assisted suicide list?
That’s why I support the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution everybody should have free to own and bear arms of Guns of any type of weapon without no gun control gun control is killing somebody that’s what gun control is stand up and fight for your second amendment without gun control laws we don’t need no more laws
Thats what I like common sense in England.
“Armed Citizenry” That means YOU. You can either cry about it and be a victim or you can learn how to use a firearm, stand up for and protect yourself. Me? I will not be a victim.
armed the ‘ ” CRUSADERS “…
Got dat$#%&!@*straight Skippy!!
LOCK-N-LOAD Moe foes!!
No s**t
Clinton is going to lose hit hard to the bottom TRUMP IS THE CHAMPION GOD BLESS TRUMP