Finally. An authority figure with real-life experience has stated that modern Islamic terrorism has changed the landscape, and the public must participate in their own defense. Liberal professors postulate, and Democrat politicians with security details wring their hands and insist that “safe zones” and “gun-free zones” will keep everyone safe from evil guns that apparently fire themselves.
Former Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble, who previously headed up all law enforcement for the U.S. Treasury Department, had a different take on how the public should respond to terrorism. He made his comments after last month’s deadly al-Shabab attack at the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, Kenya, and suggested that the most logical answer might be the arming of civilians.
That undoubtedly will have liberals crying in frustration because it is the opposite of what they want to hear.
Read Noble’s other comments on page 2:
Possibly?
Ya think… How much money did it cost for that revaluation?
A Japanese leader once said “Attacking America would be a mistake. There would be a gun behind every blade of grass”
And not the Libidiots want to take the greatest resource we have of preventing war on AMERICAN soil.
What Libidiots they are.
They are NOT idiots: They want to make sure we are defenseless against their beloved Muslime invaders. . .
That’s why Obama and Hillary want to disarm the American people
ABOUT TIME YOU WOKE up
Isn’t that interesting, I believe our Founders believed the same thing.
Arming citizens who are members of ISIS seem to work for ISIS: Wikileaks confirms Hillary sold weapons to ISIS
Although Hillary Clinton has repeatedly denied that she sold weapons to the Islamic Stats while serving as Secretary of State, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claims he has proof to the contrary. Thepoliticalinsider.com reported: In Obamas second…
True
An armed citizenry, is a polite citizenry.