Although Obama hasn’t publicly stated he wants a national gun registry and ultimate confiscation, he doesn’t have to, we’ve all known it’s ‘in the works’ and it has now been confirmed.
An internal DOJ memo has uncovered Obama’s plan to disarm America.
This memo surfaced in February but it’s veracity was in question, until now. NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam has confirmed the memo as legitimate.
The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation”and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.
You simply can’t control a country without disarming it citizens. And Obama is taking note from Hitler’s playbook:
Hitler’s Table Talk, 1941-1944: Secret Conversations – from Part Three: 6 February – 7 September 1942:
“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police.”
An internal memo within the Department of Justice (DOJ) has surfaced which confirms that the Obama administration had plans for gun registration and confiscation in the aftermath of the Newtown school shooting.
According to Bob Owens, the NRA obtained the memo in February. But apparently there were questions as to the veracity of the information. Owens says that the existence of the memo, and its outline of a plan for gun registration and confiscation, can now be confirmed.
The document, which can be viewed here, was not released to the public via the news media.
Owens cites an analysis of the memo, including direct quotes from the document, which exposes the Obama administration’s real agenda on guns:
The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.
Thus, despite the many denials by Obama, by members of his administration, and by Congressional Democrats, once again it has become clear that the administration’s true agenda is very different from that which is presented to the public.
The goal is and always has been gun registration and confiscation.
The Examiner has often reported the Obama agenda on guns, which can be traced all the way back to his years in the Illinois legislature. He was considered among the most aggressive anti-gun advocates in Illinois.
Obama voted to criminalize any homeowner who used an illegal firearm to defend himself and/or his family in the event of a home invasion by dangerous criminals.
The philosophy that underlies such a point of view is clear. To Obama it is more important that a gun be “legal” than for human lives to be saved. This stance portrays a shocking disregard for the sanctity of human life.
Thus, many conservatives warned as far back as 2007 that an Obama candidacy for the presidency would be a very dangerous turn for America. Obama would never tell the public just how radical he is. To do so would end his political career.
This is why Obama denied repeatedly that he had been close friends with murderous homegrown terrorists such as Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn. The couple bombed federal buildings, encouraged teenagers to murder their parents, and were arrested for the murder of a police officer but were released on a technicality.
It turns out that Ayers launched Obama’s political career in his living room — all confirmed as fact. Birds of a feather. And the Obama agenda reflects it.
But like so many other components of the Obama agenda, the public only finds out the real truth once the program is actually implemented. It is only then that it becomes clear that the emperor has no clothes. Only then it is too late.
Fortunately for the populace, enough conservatives, libertarians, and other freedom-loving citizens were on to the Obama gun ban agenda long before it became an issue. Nationally his agenda was thus thwarted. But astute citizens are certain that this is not the end of it.
The forces of tyranny never give up.
The question everyone should ask; what is his plan for America if he does get the guns away from us (not that he can). Why is this so important to him?
If he thinks he can succeed, he’d better think about it long and hard. There are ALOT of owners of firearms out there, and they will NOT go quietly nor surrender their firearms EVER. If he wants a revolution, then all he has to do is try to confiscate legally armed citizens. It will NOT be pretty.
not gonna happen
Yea I doubt that. The man has said he isn’t looking to disarm Americans. But to look into better mental health for the crazy people whom go out and shoot up schools and such. I call them the local terrorists. But cmon man he wouldn’t want to even begin a campaign like that. Marshal law would ensue. Of course we would get our asses kicked. Considering he has a plethora of military action to chose from. We couldnt stop him if he did want that. We are screwed and have been for decades. We kept building new and better military that is government controlled like it was only for fighting other countries. Yea right. They wanted to be the greatest and largest country in the world. Every great country or kingdom had the most dominate military. And all their people had to heed to their wants and need. Kinda like we must.
Luke, Our Constitution prevents our own military from being used against us, on our own soil. I can’t see the other two branches of government allowing it.
There is a lot more “background” story than is ever published. Mostly dealing with the political chess game that controls our lives.
“prevents”?? You fool:
This is what “crossing the Rubicon” was all about, . . . when once that was done. Words on mere paper—or spoken in the Senate—are hardly to be held as a sufficient barrier to stop or prevent the movement of a motivated army, . . . and when such a contrary army does move, civil law has then been set to one side, . . .
come on joker boy, come take them, rotten punk
As occurred after Katrina, teams of well-armed and well-armored military men will not be sensibly referred to as: “joker boy”.
He ain’t nothing but Hitlers Son.
He IS A COTTON PICKING LIAR AND HE WILL BURN IN HELL FOR HIS LIES !
WHAT IS CONGRESS GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS LOBBY AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ?????
You will be able to take me, of that I am sure, however there will be at least one job opening for whoever comes.
i WILL TELL YOU THIS TRUTH AND ACTION……. HE IS NOT, ABOVE THE ONE WHO FIRST WROTE THE LAW. YOU FEEL ME??????