Although Obama hasn’t publicly stated he wants a national gun registry and ultimate confiscation, he doesn’t have to, we’ve all known it’s ‘in the works’ and it has now been confirmed.
An internal DOJ memo has uncovered Obama’s plan to disarm America.
This memo surfaced in February but it’s veracity was in question, until now. NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam has confirmed the memo as legitimate.
The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation”and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.
You simply can’t control a country without disarming it citizens. And Obama is taking note from Hitler’s playbook:
Hitler’s Table Talk, 1941-1944: Secret Conversations – from Part Three: 6 February – 7 September 1942:
“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police.”
An internal memo within the Department of Justice (DOJ) has surfaced which confirms that the Obama administration had plans for gun registration and confiscation in the aftermath of the Newtown school shooting.
According to Bob Owens, the NRA obtained the memo in February. But apparently there were questions as to the veracity of the information. Owens says that the existence of the memo, and its outline of a plan for gun registration and confiscation, can now be confirmed.
The document, which can be viewed here, was not released to the public via the news media.
Owens cites an analysis of the memo, including direct quotes from the document, which exposes the Obama administration’s real agenda on guns:
The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.
Thus, despite the many denials by Obama, by members of his administration, and by Congressional Democrats, once again it has become clear that the administration’s true agenda is very different from that which is presented to the public.
The goal is and always has been gun registration and confiscation.
The Examiner has often reported the Obama agenda on guns, which can be traced all the way back to his years in the Illinois legislature. He was considered among the most aggressive anti-gun advocates in Illinois.
Obama voted to criminalize any homeowner who used an illegal firearm to defend himself and/or his family in the event of a home invasion by dangerous criminals.
The philosophy that underlies such a point of view is clear. To Obama it is more important that a gun be “legal” than for human lives to be saved. This stance portrays a shocking disregard for the sanctity of human life.
Thus, many conservatives warned as far back as 2007 that an Obama candidacy for the presidency would be a very dangerous turn for America. Obama would never tell the public just how radical he is. To do so would end his political career.
This is why Obama denied repeatedly that he had been close friends with murderous homegrown terrorists such as Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn. The couple bombed federal buildings, encouraged teenagers to murder their parents, and were arrested for the murder of a police officer but were released on a technicality.
It turns out that Ayers launched Obama’s political career in his living room — all confirmed as fact. Birds of a feather. And the Obama agenda reflects it.
But like so many other components of the Obama agenda, the public only finds out the real truth once the program is actually implemented. It is only then that it becomes clear that the emperor has no clothes. Only then it is too late.
Fortunately for the populace, enough conservatives, libertarians, and other freedom-loving citizens were on to the Obama gun ban agenda long before it became an issue. Nationally his agenda was thus thwarted. But astute citizens are certain that this is not the end of it.
The forces of tyranny never give up.
Sure Obama, smart man all the criminals, terrorist’s, or evil federal agents..they have all the guns…do i feel more safe ??? NOT !! YOU are cannot walk anywhere you want…many people HATE YOU !
I think this is really questionable fear-mongering propaganda. Even as a vocal critic of Obama, the government in general, and gun control, once an article compares almost any politician to Hitler I really start to drift. Then they throw in Bill Ayers, who Obama barely even knows and certainly wouldn’t be influencing his policy in regards to gun control. “Birds of a feather”… You’ve got to be kidding me! This makes zero sense: “Bill Ayers blew stuff up… Therefore Obama must want our guns!”
The document they’re referring to comes to a few main conclusions: 1) Gun buybacks are ineffective. 2) Restricting large capacity magazines — even under ideal circumstances, could take decades to implement and may not be effective. 3) Universal checks are insufficient for ensuring that firearm owners remain eligible, and an effective method might be to review background checks on domestic violence perpatrators. 4) Assault weapons are not a major contributor to US gun homicide and the existing stock of guns is large, thus “an assault weapon ban is unlikely to have an impact on gun violence.”
The only thing I see here referring to taking people’s guns away is reviewing background checks on perpetrators of domestic abuse… Which honestly kind of makes sense.
Seriously… This is real tin foil hat $#%&!@*.
redfox: THANK YOU! It’s about time more conservatives saw through the fear merchants.
H-m-m-m, . . . I cannot think of the mention of anyone’s name—not that of Caligula, not Stalin, not Pol Pot, not Hitler—for which my mind would begin to drift, . . . maybe you’ve an attention deficit malady, . . .
And then, “reviewing background checks on perpetrators of domestic abuse… Which honestly kind of makes sense.”?
I would marvel to know the name for sensible logic in which that might “make sense”, . . .
I have read of several police officers who’ve shot their wives, . . . by what apprehension of logic should we spend any time considering whether guns should be removed from the hands of police officers, or no?
I would say, ya’ need some book-larnin’, Buddy, . . .
This article says, “Obama would never tell the public just how radical he is. To do so would end his political career.”
Everything else about the article is true, but this Dictator can do anything he wants without reprisal. This has been proven, over, and over again, countless times. He is above the law, any law.
I will never vote for any one ,who does not support the 2nd amendment.
Quite frankly I am quite sure there is a national gun registry here and now. But our second amendment is not for hunting and recreational things. It is to protect U.S citizens from tyranny and abuse of power. Not to mention protection. Use wisely and do not break laws. Simple as it gets.
Scary!
$#%&!@* this negro
His dream of power is much bigger than his mind if he thinks he can pull that off…
Hang the commie SOB for treason
Would somebody please get him out of there …??