Racism is alive and well, though not exactly in the way you might think. The Supreme Court just confirmed that a university in Texas could keep a white woman out of the school, even if she was the most qualified, because she was not a woman of color.
Democrats are insisting that the number of blacks in prison are there primarily due to racism, and laws must change to decrease the number. But over half the homicides in this country are committed by young black males, which comprise perhaps 3% of the overall population. Should we just let every other African American who is a murderer go because Democrats dislike the large number of young black males in prison?
And then there are the infamous “hate” crimes. These are crimes that are actionable, generally violent assaults of some sort, where the judge or jury rules more harshly against the attacker because he or she exhibits a racist orientation as part of the motivation for committing the crime. So, for example, in a case of two white teenagers who attack a black man, take his wallet, and punch him in the face, all the while shouting racial epithets about him, the crime is judged to be worse because of the words shouted. It would seem that animas is already part of the crime since the perpetrators choose to punch the victim, and so a negative attitude can be assumed.
But racism pops up here, and it is backwards. It assumes the victim is more damaged because of the racial epithets, and it also assumes that a white victim, punched by black perpetrators who yell racial epithets is less damaged, less harmed in the beating and robbing that he or she experiences, since there is almost never a label of “hate crime” attached to an assault by a person of color attacking a white victim, even with clearly racist speech involved.
That is preposterous, but the liberal law makers have inserted into the law the very racist legal charade that black racism is acceptable, while white racism is to be punished. We are no longer equal under the law.
And so there is the case in Calgary which highlights the truly upside down nature of hate crimes and how they are evaluated. Read the details on page 2:
Obama has made it this way.
Damn it woman great motherfuckin work now we natives gotta be a part of this$#%&!@* Thank$#%&!@*she aint of my tribe…
If it were a white woman asking a black woman “do you know the time?” then that would be racist but a black woman screaming she hates white people and punching a white woman isn’t racism. Her face got in the way of the black womans fist I’m surprised the white woman wasn’t brought up on charges
That’s the only kindvof racism
They do not do anything about it because the blacks have more rights than we do. I started seeing it in the sixties and this is what has come of it. They have always been entitled to do anything they want. How many times has anyone seen them charged with hate crimes that pretty much happen on a daily basis.? What happened to equal treatment under the law? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe they’re more violent than whites, but whites r way smarter. Keep up your$#%&!@* You’ll c! Hahaha
Martin Luther king would puke if he could see the way hos people act today!! Obama,blm,black panthers,failures!!!!!!!!
PATHETIC NIGGERS ARE EVIL
Yes it is we are all the same
Reverse races and it would have been a hate crime.