Racism is alive and well, though not exactly in the way you might think. The Supreme Court just confirmed that a university in Texas could keep a white woman out of the school, even if she was the most qualified, because she was not a woman of color.
Democrats are insisting that the number of blacks in prison are there primarily due to racism, and laws must change to decrease the number. But over half the homicides in this country are committed by young black males, which comprise perhaps 3% of the overall population. Should we just let every other African American who is a murderer go because Democrats dislike the large number of young black males in prison?
And then there are the infamous “hate” crimes. These are crimes that are actionable, generally violent assaults of some sort, where the judge or jury rules more harshly against the attacker because he or she exhibits a racist orientation as part of the motivation for committing the crime. So, for example, in a case of two white teenagers who attack a black man, take his wallet, and punch him in the face, all the while shouting racial epithets about him, the crime is judged to be worse because of the words shouted. It would seem that animas is already part of the crime since the perpetrators choose to punch the victim, and so a negative attitude can be assumed.
But racism pops up here, and it is backwards. It assumes the victim is more damaged because of the racial epithets, and it also assumes that a white victim, punched by black perpetrators who yell racial epithets is less damaged, less harmed in the beating and robbing that he or she experiences, since there is almost never a label of “hate crime” attached to an assault by a person of color attacking a white victim, even with clearly racist speech involved.
That is preposterous, but the liberal law makers have inserted into the law the very racist legal charade that black racism is acceptable, while white racism is to be punished. We are no longer equal under the law.
And so there is the case in Calgary which highlights the truly upside down nature of hate crimes and how they are evaluated. Read the details on page 2:
It’s not us it’s Obumbobutt starting it all I am for getting along with everyone but he makes it hard when he is doingthegating c**p
Just more black trash.
You do the crime, you do the time and nobody cares what color you are!
now you know who the targets of genocide are this time
This is the problem. This isn’t about race, but hate. Racism is just the fuel we use to stoke the fires of hate. It is the fuel used by some of our elected officials to create divisions of special interest voters that they can pander to, making them single issue voters. It prevents us from seeing the whole picture. This woman obviously has some hate issues that go deep into her past. Blm is just keeping the fires going.
True. .he has not helped at all
I sure hope you sued the school district!
I believe the technical term you are after is transblack. Lol
In the 1970’s the serial killer, Charles Manson predicted that there would be a race war in our nation. That always stuck in my mind. There also was an R-rated cartoon Fritz The Cat, based on R. Crumb’s character. It also shows a developing race war. It is a raunchy cartoon. Vulgar and violent, but pretty much is a portrait of what is happening now. The Rodney King riots was the first nationally publicized racial violence. It seems we will have a race war coupled with radical Islam terrorism. And I’m an optomist! I also am a realist. It’s a damned sorry situation. Join the NRA…
Sure didn’t punch her because she liked her! The Judge is wrong It was a hate crime ! And that is why people keep doing it because nothing is done about it