The New York Times clearly thought they were publishing this year’s “October surprise” when they published their most recent hit piece on Donald Trump. Instead, they managed to surprise only with their own blatant hypocrisy.
The New York Times has excited the Clinton campaign and the rest of the media with a revelation that Republican nominee Donald Trump declared a $916 million loss in 1995 that might have resulted in him not paying taxes in some subsequent years.
The implication, reinforced by CNN’s Jake Tapper on State of the Union on Sunday morning, is that Trump “avoided” paying taxes, when in fact his tax liability was zero.
But the Times itself has “avoided” paying taxes — in 2014, for example.
As Forbes noted at the time:
“… for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the statement again.”
The New York Times thinks you shouldn’t trust someone who doesn’t pay taxes. By that logic, you shouldn’t trust the New York Times. For once, they might be on to something.
Sources: NY Times
A big lie (German: große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Adolf$#%&!@* when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”$#%&!@*asserted the technique was used by Jews to unfairly blame Germany’s loss in World War I on German Army officer Erich Ludendorff.
The Choice is Clear… Trump/Pence 2016… Hillary for Prison…
they lied