Hillary loves her gun-toting secret service men, who have protected her for decades, yet she believes everyday Americans don’t deserve the right to protect themselves, via gun ownership.
In her flawed opinion, Americans must be disarmed because “terrorists use guns to kill Americans.” She also believes gun manufactures should be sued by the victims of gun violence and that a national gun tax, much like a sin tax, will bring down gun violence. She is by definition insane: extremely foolish or irrational.
She has pulled out her big guns to war against gun ownership in six-part platform, a plan to “incrementally disarm America”. Clinton has used victims of violence as her poster people for her anti-gun agenda. With each tragedy, progressives punish law abiding citizens for crimes they did not commit. After the Umpqua Community College shooting, Clinton used this to gain media attention and press her plan to allow victims and families to sue gun manufacturers, because suing the maker of an object brings healing and justice.
Duke University researcher Chris Conover has demonstrated that owning a car is “80 percent” more dangerous than owning a gun–as relates to the lives of others–Clinton said nothing about allowing crash victims and their families to sue Ford, Chevrolet, Toyota, or Mercedes. Point Made, wrote Truth and Action.
Clinton asked, “What is wrong with us that we can’t stand up to the NRA and the gun lobby and the gun manufacturers they represent?” She is pledging to fight for these new controls and laws as president. Anything to take the focus off her deepening quagmire.
Her six-part plan includes this notion that suing a gun manufacturer stops the violence. Read more on the next page and be prepared to wage the intellectual battle to protect your gun rights.
I was a Democrat for years the last few years have changed my thinking. Pick & choose the laws to enforce. She has security to protect her & her family. I have a gun to protect myself. Owned guns 50 years & they have never shot anyone, but would.
Stop her
YEA RIGHT, AND SHE DISARMED OUR MARINES IN BENGHAZI THAT NIGHT WHEN SHE KILLED THEM BY NOT SENDING HELP TO THEM !!! AND LETS NOT FORGET OUR AMBASSADOR EITHER !!! WHEN THEY GOT THROUGH WITH HIM HIS BODY LOOKED LIKE A PILE OF REAL BLOODY HAMBURGER, GREAT JOB KILLARY !!!
She’s looking very elderly today.
F you killary
What a dumbass Bill of rights slayer wanna be$#%&!@*she is.
WHAT IS THE UNDERLYING REASON SHE AND OBAMA ARE SO FOCUSED ON DISARMING AMERICA? Again, Just like Health Care, there is another agenda…..
You need some filler fast, looking very old.
F@ck the nasty$#%&!@*psycho dike!
SLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952, but Obama doesn’t want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law. The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.”