Hillary does not believe in freedom for those who don’t agree with her position on abortion. If American religious freedom must be forcefully removed in order for socialist zealots to kill more unborn babies then Clinton is there to grease the wheels (assuming the Clinton Foundation gets the appropriate donations).
In a speech in 2015, Hillary told her audience at the sixth annual Women in The World Summit that a person’s “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed” so that women could have access to abortion on demand at any time. Though she framed it as reproductive health care and safe childbirth, everyone knows that she was threatening the pro-life movement to shut up or be shut up.
She continued her freedom remarks by saying that laws, in this case abortion laws, have to be “backed up with resources and political will”. In her mind, taking away the rights of those who don’t agree with her is profoundly more acceptable in her “advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone.”
Fortunately, the Internet doesn’t forget! Her speech can be seen in the video on the next page.
Watch and share! It is crucial to understand her immoral intentions and to spread the word:
She can’t wait to be able to kill even more little unborn, right up to the delivery date! Evil, evil woman!
Hillary has alredy cost the United stated money 80 million and 13 million and 200,000 she STOLD from the White House and that not counting own the 100 billion she STOLD from Wall Street how can we put Hillary Clinton in thare when she has already cost us taxpayer money before she even been in office god nos how much this women going to cost us Hillary is one evil$#%&!@*she is going to cost us trillions of dollars in taxpayers money
Good luck God wins!
she is unfit to hold anyoffice.
Good. Religion and faith is glorified ignorance!! #WakeUp
Ok that is ONE case, a cause celebre for the paranoid. Read up on the case. She was asked to remove a misquote from the Bible (one most people are unfamiliar with) not because it was religious, but because it was, I guess, kinda insubordinate to a superior with whom she was having issues. That is not religious persecution. Look, somewhere, somehow, one can find something that could, if looked at at some particular angle, as religious oppression. I do not think even this case, even in the most generous of lights, really qualifies as religious oppression, much less as evidence of some “War on Religion”. I just don’t buy it. It takes real effort to believe it.
Bigotry against Religion ^^^
Justified criticism isn’t bigotry it’s acknowledging the facts.
I cannot even stomach to listen to her anymore. TRUMP 2016 !
Fact: u hate all Religions