Hillary Clinton is an adamant opponent to the 2nd amendment and gun ownership. She is a liar and makes things up, such as claiming in the video below that 90% of the American people agree with her about “reasonable” gun laws along with 75% of gun owners. (Work the math and see if that pencils out.) Of course she cites no study or research supporting that, and the bigger question is if she actually believes that the 2nd amendment gives individuals the right to bear arms.
Move on to hear her refuse to say if there is a Constitutional right to bear arms:
How about WE, THE PEOPLE “regulate” politicians with the same careless disregard that politicians ‘regulate’ us?
I can write a thousand “Common Sense laws’ and the politicians would howl at every one of them.
Shall not be infringed$#%&!@*
Last time I looked, our country is governed by the US Constitution, Bill of Rites and should be a main focus of our daily lives. Not changed or altered by an executive order for the benefit of being used against its citizens so a President could not become our racist, Muslim, African non-documented person ruler/dictator of my country. He is a bad seed born into evil. Take his power away quickly
Do politicians have a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to be ‘politicians’?
Do bureaucrats have a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to be bureaucrats?
the Constitution is what it is (set up to control the government by the people)YOU are a LIAR and if elected president YOU STILL ARE A LIAR,with a high body co.unt to prove it. you will lie even when the Oath of office is given with your hand on the bible.
I can’t stand this ugly which I don’t want her trying to take away our guns and be like you’re up we can’t even defend yourself the Second Amendment the right to keep and bear arms what is that phrase does she not understand
she apparently has some bit of confusion, as to what it means when it says “A well regulated militia”……the 2nd amendment is quite clear on what it means by the term….and it has nothing to do with government . deciding what it can and cannot restrict…..in fact, quite the opposite really……for a long time, liberals and socialists have felt that the weakest link in the Bill of Rights, was the 2nd amendment…..and if they can convince us that these rights were actually privileges, or “suggestions” that government is allowed to revoke, amend or or alter, then none of them are rights at all…..They believe that govt has the power to decide these things alone, and the will of the people is more of a suggestion, rather than the final word……this is dangerous thinking…..as we are not subjects of govt in this country……and govt is not our supreme master either…..You can tell, they see it otherwise, when the invoke such “reason” as to say ” This European country, or Canada does this or that!”…..the countries they use as example, the people are subjects of their government….very different than what our nation is about….yes, they too have elections and parliaments and so forth….but theirs are not bound by the same definitions of what we were and are still founded upon, that is what makes America so exceptional as a nation…..in this election year, I challenge all to read the writings of the founders and those that drafted, and signed, the Bill of Rights and our constitution….for it is in their words alone, that the truth about what is meant by each and every amendment that was written…….liberals will say, “But they had slaves then, and they could not know what the future would be like!”, as well as, “but we have evolved as a culture”….the basic instincts and desires of a truly free people, cannot evolve, nor should they…as freedom, and it’s price, as well rationale is what makes us individuals, in thought and success….not the graces of kings and government…..the cemeteries are full of fools that tried to force otherwise upon us….as well as the bones of those that gave all to prove them wrong!
The government should do their job and prosecute this$#%&!@*
Hillarys Accomplishments! Interesting read,someone else posted this,,memory all should know Many people who may vote in the democratic primary election and the general election in 2016 have no real knowledge of Mrs. Clinton or her accomplishments. As a public service, I thought I would provide some input regarding her triumphs for consideration.
When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.
Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.
Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a little probing led to the discovered of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.
Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
Many younger voters will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours
Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.
Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense. Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle were:
· She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.
· She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.
· Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for lying under oath to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.
· Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.
· After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.
Now we are exposed to: the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next. But to her loyal fans – “what difference does it make?”
Yes, take our guns so we can’t defend ourselves. When the politicians give up their bodyguards; maybe I’ll agree with the public not having guns.