“The effects of sabotage of a nuclear facility would depend heavily on the specific nature of the attack, but would likely range between the other two types of attack in severity.
“The difficulty of achieving a successful sabotage is also intermediate between the other two.”
Hacktivist group Anonymous has been busy doing their part to defeat ISIS
Truth and Action shared:
Nevertheless, Anonymous’ latest Op appears to be bearing fruit. Galvanised by the groups’s online call to arms on Saturday, which has now been viewed over 5.5million times, tens of thousands of anonymous web users have been contributing to OpParis, tracking down ISIS accounts and reporting them to Twitter.
With estimates of the number of suspended ISIS accounts ranging up to the thousands, Anonymous can now claim to have done considerably more to damage ISIS than Facebook users adding tricolour flags to their profiles. Indeed, Anonymous is even doing more than some western countries, many of which still refuse to participate in the fight against ISIS. Suspending Twitter accounts may not be much, but it’s something.
It says: “Making a crude nuclear bomb would not be easy, but is potentially within the capabilities of a technically sophisticated terrorist group, as numerous government studies have confirmed.”
Source: Express Truth and Action
B******t. ISIS does not have nukes, for a group whose name includes “Truth” you don’t seem to post any.
Okay Goebels.
There is no chance.
Why would a regime that hates outside influence and can’t transport materials outside its country without notice, join forces with a group that would want to take over said regime?
Because they both hate America.
Would not surprise me one bit if Iran contributed to obama’2 elections. As for Isis, I say nuke their most important sites.