There is currently a plan to ditch the Electoral College – giving the Presidency to whoever wins the popular vote – and 12 states have already signed on.
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” states Fox News politics editor Chris Stirewalt, and it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Stirewalt also states that without the Electoral College we would have had a whole different trajectory of presidents. With a popular vote presidential candidates would ignore rural areas and focus only on urban centers. The “plan is to subvert the will of the Constitution and the founders.”
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” he concludes, and it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Nearly a dozen states have quietly signed onto a plan to effectively ditch the Electoral College and instead, award the White House to the candidate that wins the popular vote.
The National Popular Vote agreement would take effect if states that represent 270 electoral votes all commit. New York has most recently joined the efforts, bringing the number of states to 10 plus the District of Columbia. Altogether, they represent 165 electoral votes.
Without the Electoral College, FoxNews.com digital politics editor Chris Stirewalt said we would have had a whole different trajectory of presidents. If presidents are selected through the popular vote, he said that campaigns will focus on maximizing turnout in urban centers. He said the “plan is to subvert the will of the Constitution and the founders.”
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” he said, explaining that it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Since there is not enough support in Congress to change the Constitution and officially end the Electoral College, this plan would allow popular vote advocates to work around it.
Stirewalt pointed out that this plan is part of a larger trend on the part of “frustrated” liberals who haven’t been able to bring about the changes they want.
“They are simply taking them. They are simply doing it and if people dissent and if people complain and if the stodgy, old Constitution gets in the way, if the fussy old Whigs in the Electoral College complain about it, too bad. Because they’re gonna hack the code and they’re gonna find a way to get what they want,” he said.
So can this actually happen?
Stirewalt believes there will be significant pushback once people across the United States realize the “deadly gravity of what is being proposed” and if the states move closer to 270.
Nearly a dozen states have quietly signed onto a plan to effectively ditch the Electoral College and instead, award the White House to the candidate that wins the popular vote.
The National Popular Vote agreement would take effect if states that represent 270 electoral votes all commit. New York has most recently joined the efforts, bringing the number of states to 10 plus the District of Columbia. Altogether, they represent 165 electoral votes.
Without the Electoral College, FoxNews.com digital politics editor Chris Stirewalt said we would have had a whole different trajectory of presidents. If presidents are selected through the popular vote, he said that campaigns will focus on maximizing turnout in urban centers. He said the “plan is to subvert the will of the Constitution and the founders.”
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” he said, explaining that it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Since there is not enough support in Congress to change the Constitution and officially end the Electoral College, this plan would allow popular vote advocates to work around it.
Stirewalt pointed out that this plan is part of a larger trend on the part of “frustrated” liberals who haven’t been able to bring about the changes they want.
“They are simply taking them. They are simply doing it and if people dissent and if people complain and if the stodgy, old Constitution gets in the way, if the fussy old Whigs in the Electoral College complain about it, too bad. Because they’re gonna hack the code and they’re gonna find a way to get what they want,” he said.
So can this actually happen?
Stirewalt believes there will be significant pushback once people across the United States realize the “deadly gravity of what is being proposed” and if the states move closer to 270.
Richard Eckard
Down with the Electoral College Hegemony..up with Popular Vote..in time it will show itself to e a better system and eliminates an ability of Elites to manipulate entire populations. It is the Right of the people to alter their Constitution….at times it is a duty.
Undecided yet.
Dawn Struthers, hey you ignorant dumbass c**p dlinging dingbat fool of who is a waste of oxygen, how does it feel to have someone call you names instead of actually answering in a respectfil intelligent fashion
We would have had one change…Gore instead of Bush and we all know that this would have saved us a lot of heartache. We need the popular vote…what is happening is that the dumb right wing is losing so they are trying to figure out a way to hold on to minority rule.
We have to repeal the 12th amendment. RGO
Liberal IDIOTS SLITHER BACK INTO YOUR SNAKE HOLES AND STOP POSTING YOUR GARBAGE ON OUR SITES ! ! LIBERALS ARE TRYING TO FIND ANOTHER WAY TO ( STEAL AN ELECTION ) ! We need Voter ID more then ever ! Liberals know its easy to steal an election without the Electoral College so their trying to STEAL ANOTHER ELECTION BY WANTING TO SO CALLED POPULAR VOTE TO ELECT PRESIDENTS ! I don’t trust ANYTHING LIBERAL IDIOTS SAY OR DO !
ROBERT OLER THE ONLY DUMB THING ON THIS SITE IS YOU AND OTHER LIBERALS WHO KEEP COMING TO OUR SITES TO PREACH LIBERAL HATRED AND SPREAD YOUR IGNORANCE !
This will destroy America!
I don’t think is so bad.
Get rid of electoral college c**p !