There is currently a plan to ditch the Electoral College – giving the Presidency to whoever wins the popular vote – and 12 states have already signed on.
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” states Fox News politics editor Chris Stirewalt, and it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Stirewalt also states that without the Electoral College we would have had a whole different trajectory of presidents. With a popular vote presidential candidates would ignore rural areas and focus only on urban centers. The “plan is to subvert the will of the Constitution and the founders.”
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” he concludes, and it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Nearly a dozen states have quietly signed onto a plan to effectively ditch the Electoral College and instead, award the White House to the candidate that wins the popular vote.
The National Popular Vote agreement would take effect if states that represent 270 electoral votes all commit. New York has most recently joined the efforts, bringing the number of states to 10 plus the District of Columbia. Altogether, they represent 165 electoral votes.
Without the Electoral College, FoxNews.com digital politics editor Chris Stirewalt said we would have had a whole different trajectory of presidents. If presidents are selected through the popular vote, he said that campaigns will focus on maximizing turnout in urban centers. He said the “plan is to subvert the will of the Constitution and the founders.”
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” he said, explaining that it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Since there is not enough support in Congress to change the Constitution and officially end the Electoral College, this plan would allow popular vote advocates to work around it.
Stirewalt pointed out that this plan is part of a larger trend on the part of “frustrated” liberals who haven’t been able to bring about the changes they want.
“They are simply taking them. They are simply doing it and if people dissent and if people complain and if the stodgy, old Constitution gets in the way, if the fussy old Whigs in the Electoral College complain about it, too bad. Because they’re gonna hack the code and they’re gonna find a way to get what they want,” he said.
So can this actually happen?
Stirewalt believes there will be significant pushback once people across the United States realize the “deadly gravity of what is being proposed” and if the states move closer to 270.
Nearly a dozen states have quietly signed onto a plan to effectively ditch the Electoral College and instead, award the White House to the candidate that wins the popular vote.
The National Popular Vote agreement would take effect if states that represent 270 electoral votes all commit. New York has most recently joined the efforts, bringing the number of states to 10 plus the District of Columbia. Altogether, they represent 165 electoral votes.
Without the Electoral College, FoxNews.com digital politics editor Chris Stirewalt said we would have had a whole different trajectory of presidents. If presidents are selected through the popular vote, he said that campaigns will focus on maximizing turnout in urban centers. He said the “plan is to subvert the will of the Constitution and the founders.”
“This is disempowering to rural America and empowering to urban America,” he said, explaining that it amounts to a “hack” of the Constitution by people who don’t believe in the Electoral College.
Since there is not enough support in Congress to change the Constitution and officially end the Electoral College, this plan would allow popular vote advocates to work around it.
Stirewalt pointed out that this plan is part of a larger trend on the part of “frustrated” liberals who haven’t been able to bring about the changes they want.
“They are simply taking them. They are simply doing it and if people dissent and if people complain and if the stodgy, old Constitution gets in the way, if the fussy old Whigs in the Electoral College complain about it, too bad. Because they’re gonna hack the code and they’re gonna find a way to get what they want,” he said.
So can this actually happen?
Stirewalt believes there will be significant pushback once people across the United States realize the “deadly gravity of what is being proposed” and if the states move closer to 270.
It does not take six months to get a letter across the Untied States, we do not need an Electoral College.
Fire Barrack Obama.
This is a terrible idea, this is another attempt to take away the power of the vote and put it into the Party who gave us Obama Care. Not something our Founding Fathers wanted. Another ploy to have the ruling elitist Party control elections and select radicals to continue the transformation from a free society to an oppressive tyrannical form of government!!
Why should rural America go by big city agenda’s when they’ve already proven they don’t know what they are doing
No, it would require a constitutional amendment to make this change.
No electoral college = mob rule.
we would have had a republican president if not for the electoral college…get rid of it and let the votes count
keep the electoral college
There will not be Obama’s new America. There will be no America unless the spineless Republicans impeach now.
the electoral college makes thing a lot more fair to all of us. the 12 states that have singed on to this must be blue states. dems well not be happy until we have a communist government with them in charge.