Lindsey Graham is often a tough Senator to predict. He is both staunchly conservative and comparatively liberal depending on the topic — but it’s easy to project where he’s going to fall when it comes to the military. Graham is almost always pro-military intervention, and he based his entire presidential campaign on that strategy. Not that anyone noticed.
At the time of this run, Graham used his neo conservatism to put distance between himself and frontrunner Donald Trump, who was promising a much more non-interventionalist foreign policy. Since Trump was elected, however, the president has shifted his tone. He now talks as if war is always on the table — even if his actions remained pretty consistent with his campaign.
So does that mean that Graham and Trump are now saying the same things when it comes to foreign intervention?
In one case, the answer seems to be yes.
See what Graham said about the president, North Korea and war on the next page:
Should he not be talking to Trump?
Totally a violation of international law and the Geneva Conventions. The North Koreans have already been bombed flat by us once.
Why don’t YOU shut the$#%&!@*up since you aren’t President either and are apparently on a similar educational and intellectual level as he is, which btw, is an insult.
Pedophile
Let’s get started and do it the time for talk is over
On drugs.
Actually, these United States don’t need to ‘Nuke’ anybody. Ever hear of the MOAB? Can be dropped miles away because it can use GPS coordinated to guide it to it’s target.
Ban that camera whore from television
He makes it up as he goes along
And then, Garry, the North would invade South Korea, and then what?
He flip-flops so many times that he is incoherent.