Last year, Senate Republicans played a dangerous game with the Supreme Court. This year, it seems to have paid off in more ways than one. They’re getting the pick they wanted — and they’re aggravating their liberal colleagues in the process.
When Antonin Scalia unexpectedly passed last year, the bench faced a predicament it had avoided for decades. For the first time in several administrations, the White House had the opportunity to upend the ideological balance of the nation’s highest court.
Or, they thought they did, anyway.
Republicans refused to hold hearings for Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland. Instead, they argued that the next president — whoever that may be — should be the one to fill the vacancy. The GOP leadership were betting that the polls were wrong and that Donald Trump would stage an incredible come-from-behind victory.
When he did, all eyes turned to Trump — whose conservative credentials were questioned by many mainstream Republicans for the duration of the campaign.
But if you need proof that Trump nominated a capable constitutionalist to the court, watch him take down California Senator Dianne Feinstein on the next page:
I will no longer read truth and action. I remove sites that do not address the subject of the headline on the first page. My time is too valuable to waste it reading a bunch of filler so that I will “read more”
Please tell your daughters and wives not to be saying hey guys unless they are ready to be with them. Enough of the outcry about sexual assaults.
Love it
She’s from California!
She is another$#%&!@*savage whore in the Democratic Party
She is the president of Hillary’s Fan Club….that’s it!
she’s an airhead demwit, she knows nothing
She needs to retire with Pelosi and Waters.
66
It is time for Frakenstein to retire..