If you step outside, you will notice the atmosphere is not on fire and the ocean hasn’t welled up to your doorstep. You may even by inclined to say that the oft-spouted liberal line that global climate change exists actually doesn’t. It turns out, you’re right.
Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has discovered through private research that NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies has fudged the numbers on raw temperature data in order to invent the trend of global warming.
While the average temperature of Australia has gone up 0.6339°C since 2000, the rest of the globe has actually been cooling. From 1940 until today, the average temperature of the globe has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C. Not exactly the end of the world, as the liberal mainstream media would want you to believe.
Prof. Ewert remarked that the scale of the change perpetrated by NASA is ‘unbelievable’.
Find out more about these numbers and the effect of this NASA fraud on page 2.
I tell you what…go ahead and bury your head in the sand if you want..but climate change is real! We’re abusing the planet and she’s fighting back.
The inclusion i was referring to was a Bernie Sanders presidency. How he would fight things like Citizens United, and corporate influence to include a wider range of opinions. Doing nothing is the status quo. If congress were to vote on these issues in the same ratio of climate scientists there would be aggressive policies to address the problem. Maybe on the scale of what happened to manufacturing during the buildup to ww2. Wind turbines and solar panels will come down in price as more are made. Government investment in industry helps to develop the industry to the scale that would be necessary to replace fossil fuels. It may take decades for a complete transition. But industries would need to be coordinated. The only thing that could do this in a democratic way is the government. As long as we can get a representative government, one that represents science and its findings. If you dont believe in global warming i have 2 words for you, El Nino. How much heat does it take to warm the pacific ocean.
s. dont need more of same ol same ol propagandaorry bernie more immediate issues
What is a more immediate issue than addressing the corruption of the electoral process?
getting killed my children my grandchildren. food on table and roof over our heads
Johnny Torrance, you raise a good point and good question. First, I’m not concerned about the politics behind this particular issue. Al Gore will probably be dead in 15-20 years anyway so he doesn’t even factor in. Sure, some people are going to try and profit from it. Again, a non issue. I am not biased because of any political affiliation but I do understand how that plays in to the debate.
As for the scientist and a “cooling trend”. This isn’t anything new. There have been many cycles identified which affect global climate. They range from an 11 year solar cycle to a 140 million year galactic cycle and a bunch in between. National Geographic had a good article on it years ago. These natural cycles can work together to cause drastic changes or cancel each other out and usually it takes hundreds or thousands of years for anything extreme like an ice age to occur. The cycle with the greatest effect is an ocean current that flows around the world and if I remember right it’s a 130 or so year thing.
Few people have the foresight to think about hundreds of years from now. Not many have the foresight to think beyond what’s for lunch tomorrow. Allot of other people will say “who cares because I won’t be here anyway.” Unless they can actually witness changes occurring right before their eyes, they’ll deny it.
So, this scientist may not be wrong but he is showing just one piece of a very large puzzle. Let’s say, a yellow one. Does that confirm that the puzzle is a picture of a banana? Seems allot of people are content to believe so.
Wow deniers are stupid. The find 1 scientist who agrees with them and they dismiss hundreds of scientists from different areas of study who disagree with them.
data computation expert? there’s a howler.
Manmade climate change
not science