If you step outside, you will notice the atmosphere is not on fire and the ocean hasn’t welled up to your doorstep. You may even by inclined to say that the oft-spouted liberal line that global climate change exists actually doesn’t. It turns out, you’re right.
Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has discovered through private research that NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies has fudged the numbers on raw temperature data in order to invent the trend of global warming.
While the average temperature of Australia has gone up 0.6339°C since 2000, the rest of the globe has actually been cooling. From 1940 until today, the average temperature of the globe has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C. Not exactly the end of the world, as the liberal mainstream media would want you to believe.
Prof. Ewert remarked that the scale of the change perpetrated by NASA is ‘unbelievable’.
Find out more about these numbers and the effect of this NASA fraud on page 2.
Thats not whats being said there is no Debate when it comes to science its all numbers. And trying to change the numbers. These numbers were by the worlds scientists. No one has that much control. The warning is clear. And sure hell don’t gain anything by it nor do the scientists that have given this warning. In fact the opposite they well lose funding from the Oil & Coal companies.
So Tommy I hope your truck has a massive clearance and does not mind stopping in a red light with 2 to 4 feet of water not a laughing matter look at miami herald photoes and the multi million dollars of pumps draining the saltwater that is blocks away from the beach not a few waves but several feet every year the saltwater goes further inland don’t be closed mind look at photoes also in ny times
They were doing things like placing weather recording stations in the hottest part of a city, on major airport runways or anyplace that would be abnormally hot.
When that wasn’t extreme enough, they simply made up data.
Money can make a scientist say anything, just saying.
Mike Merritt ,but it seems like there would be more money in claiming that climate change is a hoax and receiving funding from oil and gas…
The “unholy” narrative. Bolstered through lies and catchy slogans.
Rutgers snow lab fudged their data to show heavy snow melt by merely stating that 20 years ago, the snow pack was much taller than the estimated pack 20 years ago.
So by over stating the height of the historical snowpack with no data to back up their claim, they could show a large snow melt where nine my exist at all. Total nonsense .
Obama wrong on Climate Change says physicist Freeman Dyson
Theoretical physicist and Democrat voter Freeman Dyson has expressed his disappointment with President Obama’s stance on climate change.
“It’s very sad that in this country, political opinion parted [people’s views on climate change],” he said, in an interview with The Register. “I’m 100 percent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this issue, and the Republicans took the right side.”
Now retired, Dyson was a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton between 1953 and 1994. Famed for his work in quantum electrodynamics and nuclear engineering, Dyson also worked on climate studies during his career.
Climate change, according to Freeman, “is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts?”
The physicist and mathematician argues that pollution caused by fossil fuels has been conflated with climate change. “Coal is very unpleasant stuff, and there are problems with coal quite apart from climate,” he said. “Pollution is quite separate to the climate problem: one can be solved, and the other cannot, and the public doesn’t understand that.”
During his interview with The Register Dyson noted shortcomings in climate models. “What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies between what’s observed and what’s predicted have become much stronger,” he said. “It’s clear now the models are wrong, but it wasn’t so clear 10 years ago. I can’t say if they’ll always be wrong, but the observations are improving and so the models are becoming more verifiable.”
Dyson also wrote a strong foreword to a report published Monday by The Global Warming Policy Foundation, which calls for a reassessment of carbon dioxide. “To any unprejudiced person reading this account, the facts should be obvious: that the non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial, that the possibly harmful climatic effects of carbon dioxide have been greatly exaggerated, and that the benefits clearly outweigh the possible damage,” he wrote.
God is in control.
Liberals elected Obama. They believe anything.