Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is releasing a new book in which he argues that the phrase “when serving in the militia” should be added to the Second Amendment.
The book is titled, “Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution”
The Second Amendment reads as follows: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
With Stevens’ proposed change: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms [when serving in the Militia] shall not be infringed.
Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is set to release a new book in which he argues that the phrase “when serving in the militia” should be added to the Second Amendment.
The book is titled, “Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution,” and the change Stevens has in mind for the Second Amendment would alter the language so as to render it a protection of a collective right instead of an individual one.
Moreover, it would be a right that the government–at all levels–could regulate without hesitation.
Currently, the Second Amendment reads:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Stevens’ contends that this was intended as a collective right only and that it was “limited in scope to the uses of arms related to military activity.”
According to The Washington Post, Stevens claims this was changed via the Supreme Court’s District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) decision. He says this decision suddenly introduced protections for “a civilian’s right to keep a handgun in his home for purposes of self-defense.”
Stevens says the McDonald v. Chicago (2010) decision furthered these changes by using “the due process clause of the 14th Amendment” to limit the ability of cities to ban the possession of handguns.
He says this can all be remedied by adding five words to the Second Amendment:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms [when serving in the Militia] shall not be infringed
don’t you idiots get it yet? The Constitution isn’t open for debate
This man is an $#%&!@*. How did such a moron become a Justice of the SCOTUS ?
You had your chance. Go back to the home and knit yourself A warm sweater.
they trying everything it also says can keep and bear arms only when serving in the mititia not gonna happen man Get a life
DICK ACT 1902 GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN 2ND AMENDMENT UNTOUCHABLE!!
Senility working its’ wonders I see, what I don’t see is the word “FREE” in front of any words that read “People”… How many more mistakes can you catch here??? It’s Bad Decision making like this that get’s “FREE People” in trouble with real world problems…
another with dementia
Screw the old bastard… hasn’t he messed up enough lives when he served on the court ??
no way in hell thios alone would accomplish what pobama is trying tpo do
When things work, you don’t need to fix ’em. This Constitution works if we demand Congress and the President follow the law it lays out.