Federal Judges Order Texas to Redraw Congressional District Boundary Lines

While the Democrats in the rest of the country are very hard at work attempting to mute public discussion involving the preservation of our American history…real American historical events that shaped us and actually made us the envy of the world as we moved past slavery and into the era of recognizing all men as being on equal standing with each other…the Jackass Party activist organizations in Texas are just as hard at work, doing what they do best:  Calling Southerners racist.

In Texas, a Jackass political action group, most likely funded by one of Soros thousands of committees and organizations in existence for the express purpose of shutting down public discourse and First Amendment rights has won a pretty big victory in a San Antonio district court this week.

The group was able, through its legal network, to convince a mostly Leftist panel of judges that make up the San Antonio court system, that Texas legislators used “racism” as their driving creative force behind redrawing the voting districts in that area of the Lone Star State.

Three federal judges have ordered Texas to redraw congressional district boundary lines after ruling the Republican-led state legislature intended to discriminate against minority voters in crafting the original boundaries.

The decision is almost certain to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, setting up another battle on the eve of the decennial reapportionment and redistricting process that could determine how far parties may go to tilt the political scales in their favor.

The federal judges said, in an opinion issued late Tuesday, that congressional districts held by Reps. Blake Farenthold (R) and Lloyd Doggett (D) were drawn with the intent to diminish the political power of minority voters.

The two districts were drawn in 2013, two years after the initial round of new maps came under scrutiny by federal judges. The court ruled Tuesday that the new lines continued the discriminatory intent first demonstrated under the initial 2011 lines.

“The Court concludes that the racially discriminatory intent and effects that it previously found in the 2011 plans carry over into the 2013 plans where … district lines remain unchanged,” the judges wrote in a unanimous opinion. “The Legislature in 2013 intentionally furthered and continued the existing discrimination in the plans.”

So, basically, what’s going on here is that the Texas winners of the electoral districts have the legal ability to redistrict the electoral maps…as a prize for winning the election, basically.  Most states, I believe do.  And in California, New York, Michigan, etc., where heavily Democratic Party districts exist, the same rules apply.  What happens in these districts, by the way, is EXACTLY what happens in the Republican districts.  The Jackass Party gets together and determines what areas of the map look suspect (in other words, which ones have either flipped or look close to flipping to the other party for various reasons…i.e., people moving, a shift in economic opportunity, changes in local laws, etc.) and they re-draw those districts to include MORE Democrat influence and LESS Republican influence and, voila!  Instant electoral success!

Now, Republicans don’t generally challenge these redistricting efforts by Jackass Party groups in charge of the electoral commissions because it’s clearly understood that the winners of those districts have the legal ability to do so.  And don’t think for one second that the Democrats in charge of the wins in counties and districts in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania where Trump barely won the Democratic state’s majority, are not feverishly contemplating and re-plotting the lines of delineation between their districts and the Republican districts in order to regain that edge in voting prowess.

The strategy here is twofold, however.  One of the plans is to perpetuate this notion that Republicans are racist White people who care nothing for the plight of minorities.  The second is to somehow plant in the minds of the voter a sense of dread and remorse.  If the lower courts are ruling in favor of the Democrats in this case where they are shouting “racism” and “voter suppression,” then the charges MUST BE TRUE!  Why else would the courts rule in favor of the Jackasses?

What’s not clear in a publication as blatantly Leftist as The Hill is that the legal district of San Antonio is a huge Regressive Leftist activist judge field of dreams, where very little that issues from the gavel of this network is Right-wing or even Moderately Centrist.

For now, this is a victory for the racists in the Democrat Party who see nothing BUT color when it comes to looking at people.  But when the Supreme Court ends up overturning this poor excuse for a ruling, The Hill will necessarily publish a confused and convoluted piece pondering the questions as to why five Supreme Court judges ruled in such a divisive way to tip the scales of racial justice into the realm of racial injustice.

Source:  The Hill