With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Must of been an Obama appointee.
Bull$#%&!@*fed court
Bullcrap we as citizens need more cameras pointed at the corruption
Appeal
Liberal court I am sure. Get rid of these liberal federal judges.
Repeal this travesty
Make them accountable
B******t
Wanna bet?
Too much literal truth? 1st amendment
Totally bull. It’s time to remove every one of these judges who continue to cover up for the criminals.
Of please remove every last one of these Traitors.
#DONALDTRUMPFORPRESIDENT
@IndiesforTrump
@realDonaldTrump