With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
B******t
They vow to uphold the constitution. But, money talks.
As long as they hold Office They are Ours to watch for they were elected By The People. Hence Public Office. Smile bitches.
Democrats
That will go to the spereme court. And Trump needs to fire tjis judge. That OBUMMER HIRED.
PLEASE TRUMP APPOINT A GOOD JUDGE TO THIS OFFICE AND GIRE THIS BOZO!
They Work for us!!!!! They should be under public scrutiny continuously!!!!!!
When we’ll they learn They work for We THe People……
Someone should put this$#%&!@*completely out of our lives with one shot
Let me guess
WELL WE’LL WELL WONDER OF WONDERS