With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Il film anyway$#%&!@*you judge
Sounds like must have something to hide, doesn’t it?
Try and stop us
How do you like ninth circuit now…????
Thats a load of$#%&!@* you’ll get photographed everytime you screw up.
Another moron on the bench.
Wrong.
It’s because the American people are catching them being criminals themselves. They want to remain hid from the public eyes when they commit crimes above the laws.
Poor “Armageddon” Pelosi …….
You can’t stop all of us. Drain the swamp.