With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
The Supreme Court says we do so screw your federal court case
What rights are next? I know, the right to yell; Trump your a$#%&!@*
More Obummer BULL C**P!!
One step closer to a dictator ship.
Dumocrats against americans what you going to do chop our heads off
Not constitutional!
B.S
What do they have to hide
Supreme Court already ruled differently, as I recall.
Certain law enforcement actions I can understand due to tactics. Other than that, videos clear BS complaints quick. Politicians? Why not?