With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Why their corruption will be revealed
sounds like KGB tactics
They then have no right to film or eavesdrop on us. Get rid of the NSA and CIA.
BS
F**k you judge
Liberals
Take it up again.
needs to go supreme court needs to decide
And how bout obama wire tapping citizens telephones Hmmmm
Why not. Because the truth will be found out about the police state.