With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Let us know how that works out for you. Oh, and SMILE.
Blahahaha blahahaha
Makes no sense. The Supreme Court already confirms this right.
B******t I will record what I want , especially if its something someone is doing illegal.
They can go$#%&!@*themselves….
BULL$#%&!@*!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bull
Pelosi should have her gun permit revoked- it is clear she is unstable and deranged
F**e
Well it’s not going to stop happening. The judge does not know the law.