Fake News Industrial Complex: FBI Officials Could Testify Against Trump


 In the case of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his obvious political witch hunt for a chance to distract away from the failure of Hillary Clinton and a chance to blame something…anything…for the massive incompetence of not only the Jackasses of Congress, but the RINOs as well, there is already so much information floating around out there that speaks volumes about how tilted in one direction this investigation really is.  No one can deny that this attempt by the Fake News Industrial Complex (FNIC) is a political witch hunt, but that doesn’t change the fact that they’re going to try their damnedest to inflict some sort of damage upon the administration for daring to question the Establishmentariat and deigning to represent the will of the People instead of the will of the Holy Government.

The one quote I’m going to pull from this report is one that I believe you should hear before anything else.  Here goes:

FBI agents are experienced witnesses who routinely testify in high-pressure cases. Plus, the FBI itself is a rare public institution that is widely respected and trusted by the American public.

The reason I pulled this quote is because it is one of those tried-and-true examples of Leftist media bias.  You make a statement of “fact,” repeat it, and after a few thousand times of repeating it, it becomes the truth.

Now ask yourself:  “Did I believe the statement above about the FBI when I initially read it?”  Or:  “Did I read the statement above about the FBI and immediately my gut wrenched into a tight ball and my teeth clenched, and my mind screamed out, ‘Lies!’?”

If you’re like me, the latter was your reaction.  If it wasn’t, well then this article by Murray Waas is perfect for you.  The premise of the article is that President Trump may be in much deeper trouble than anyone in the Right-wing media is letting on, because there is a ton of evidence that Mueller is collating to basically make this a slam dunk against the president.  In fact, as I’m writing this, about two minutes ago, Mueller has impaneled a grand jury in the Swamp to look into the whole Russia-Trump Collusion, again, full well knowing that he was not hired to investigate that matter, because there was nothing to it.  But who better to waste American taxpayer dollars than the Swamp Establishmentariat.  They have to save face, right?  They lost to Trump and his supporters.  They need the satisfaction of taking him down in any way possible.  This is that attempt.

As I said, Murray Waas wrote a piece informing us that we’re just mind-numbed idiots for believing that there’s nothing here to investigate.  In fact, he KNOWS for sure that there is.  He has his unnamed sources to prove it!  I approached this article like I do most.  I read the source material and the facts and then I look at the writer of the piece.  You can really save yourself a lot of time, effort and worry over the contentions of the piece by just looking into the background of the writer.

In a piece a couple of months ago, the headline blared “Five Republicans Now Discussing Impeachment!”  I didn’t need to read the piece to know where the article was headed.  So, instead, I looked at the names of the five Republicans and began to do research on them instead.  I wanted to know, first, why it was that Republicans were turning on their president, and second, were they really Republicans, or were they RINOs up to their necks in the Swamp Establishmentariat.  As it turned out, it was worse.  One of them was even a Jackass before he turned into a RINO because he couldn’t have maintained his seat in North Carolina if he hadn’t!  Of course he was talking impeachment!  He was a Jackass!  Exposing all five was sweet, redeeming and cathartic.

In this piece, after reading the quote about how “respected among the American people” the FBI is, I knew that I have to look into the writer.  And once again, I was vindicated.

Murray Waas is a native Philadelphian and a graduate of George Washington University who has spent his entire career so far in ambulance-chasing Republican scandals exclusively.  The guy is a walking encyclopedia of GOP Destruction by Journalism 101 and has been an advocate for all things Jackass for the past two decades.  Waas has completed his indentured servitude to all the Leftist press, having worked at the New Yorker, the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, the Atlantic, the Boston Globe, etc.  He was one of a small group of reporters who led the charge against Reagan and Bush during the Iran-Contra Affair.  He also pursued a line of journalism that said there was a secret intelligence sharing going on between the Saddam Hussein regime and President Reagan and Vice President Bush, but that they lied to Congress about having ended such communications.

Waas also cover the Valerie Plame case, following the conviction of Scooter Libby for her “outing” to the New York Times.  There was his defense of Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky affair in which he explained later that his reporting “has served as a counterweight to the mainstream media’s wolfpack mindset.”  Just imagine if today, a well-known journalist had stood up and said that they were defending Trump to serve as a “counterweight to the mainstream media’s wolfpack mindset.”  They’d be beaten out of town.

Finally, there’s Waas’ unwavering support of Obama’s Unaffordable Healthcare Act.

Knowing all this, is it any wonder that he believes the FBI is the most trusted institution in America?  Later in his piece, he attempts to back up that claim by citing a poll from 2015 that proves his point.  Knowing what we know now about Comey and the Hillary pass on indictment, don’t you think the opinion might be a bit different these days?

Be that as it may, Waas writes an incredibly lengthy piece reiterating that many top officials in the Comey chain of command within the FBI, including acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, as well as Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, will be called to testify on behalf of the case for proving “obstruction” AFTER proving “collusion.”  That is, in my humble opinion, a very tall order.

Source:  Vox



Share

23 Comments

Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest